They state at the very outset that they worked on the data for over a year, doing OCR, analyzing, digesting, cross-referencing, etc. No one is presenting a false front -- they aren't claiming that this is a bunch of files that they got yesterday, and instead are quite up front that they've done a lot of leg work on top of it.
So yes, the presentation was clearly "planned". That doesn't make the data any less real.
So yes, the presentation was clearly "planned". That doesn't make the data any less real.