Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

John the more I think about Theranos the more I think this “mess” is actually deliberate. Looking at the history of Theranos and the composition of the board it appears Theranos was designed from early on as a vehicle to defrauded the US military.

The plan appeared to be to use their connection and access to some rather “helpful” high brass to offload the technology for billions and then later sweep the fact that it didn’t work under the rug (this tactic has worked fabulously for the last 20 years). Avoid the FDA altogether.

Who would have noticed another $10 billion misspent on some wizz-bang technology given the $100s billions lost in other frauds? When the wheels fell of this plan (some underling didn’t play along) the idea seems to be to blame the scientists and say “we were misled”. They might be evil, but they don’t appear to be stupid.




Theranos must have pissed off someone very important, that lead to the initial WSJ article, and then to a reliable stream of revealing WSJ articles. I also think that this important person is in the military.


The downfall was a few years ago when the initial plan of just having the military buy Edison without it being run through a normal FDA testing program got blocked. If they had managed to avoid this they would have made out like bandits (well military contractors).

As for the WSJ there are a lot of waring parties trying to defraud military - the established big contractors don’t really want new competitors stepping on their turf.


Can you post a link to this Edison story? (I am in tech, not biotech)





Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: