It's OK if you don't want to take the time to dissect the paper's findings, or to keep up with the major highlights of climate change research, generally.
But perhaps you shouldn't attack their findings as some kind of "party line", then (and implicitly, the researchers as being party shills, basically, for toeing it).
But perhaps you shouldn't attack their findings as some kind of "party line", then (and implicitly, the researchers as being party shills, basically, for toeing it).