Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's not so much a back door as a potential vulnerability.



A distinction in phrase only.


Not true. To say something has a "back door" is to imply security was deliberately compromised by the manufacturer, whereas a vulnerability is a security weakness in the the architecture or implementation.

This is not a "back door". It's just not.


I get what you're saying but it would have made more sense had Apple not added the Secure Enclave to newer iPhones. I.e. they tried to make it more secure, so I have to conclude that they had tried their best with the older versions, too.


A simple flow chart or state diagram would show the vulnerability. I'm not saying it was intentional, but I believe the backdoor label can be applied to accidental entrances as well.

The bottom line is that Apple produced a device whose security features could be circumvented.


All security features can be circumvented. Security is not absolute




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: