I'm starting to get into Clojure from Python as well. Thanks for this link.
I like how Flightcaster separates their webfrontend tech with the mapreduce backend. So I probably won't make a full switch. Wonder how many other pythonistas are doing the same.
I made the switch from Python to Clojure last October and I'm loving every minute of coding in Clojure. It feels like just the right mix between Python and Lisp.
> It feels like just the right mix between Python and Lisp
I'd have to second that. As Peter Norvig once said, Python is Lisp in snake skin (something like that I think), so it would make sense why it is somewhat of a comfortable move. I personally still use both.
Oh, don't get me wrong - I still like Python very much and its unlikely I'll stop using it completely any time soon. Its still useful for a lot of tasks, though most of my heavy programming tasks are being transitioned to Clojure. I personally love functional programming, so it was a pretty natural progression for me.
I do find the appeal of Clojure quite alluring (I've long had a weakness for Lisp-based languages), but I'm not so keen on having to deal with the Java platform as it's not really to my taste.
Not really wanting to deal either with the Java class libraries or all the XML that seems to proliferate in the Java world.
The beauty of Clojure is that it let's you get as close to Java as you desire. Aside from installation considerations ("Do I have the right version of Java installed?") this is especially true in the upcoming 1.2 release. That is, with the addition of types and protocols it's never been easier to forget that you're on the JVM. I'm not sure what to make about your comment regarding XML, but if that is truly a determining factor then there are reasonable facsimiles of Clojure targeting .NET and Javascript (http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-clr and http://clojurescript.n01se.net/repl/ respectively).
I've always been passionate about hating Java. But there are a lot of benefits with being horrible but prolific language: libraries & battle-hardened code.
Jython has never really given me the same feeling as Clojure.
I looked at the Clojure code and I find it's so ugly compared to Python, Java, or C#. I don't know why would anyone considered that a contender for writing code in the long run. I know the three languages mentioned above and I find Python is the most easy to read and code. Code readability is one of the most important criteria for me.
The problem is with your argument is that that sort of observation is purely subjective. It's based on your experience. It's almost a trope for a discussion about lisps to have someone make the claim 'All those parenthesis are ugly!' and have some lispers chime in with 'Really, its not that bad! I hardly see them at all!'
I've learnt that hard way that writing off a language because you hate the syntax from your initial impressions to be a _huge_ mistake. I used to detest Haskell's syntax for so many reasons after suffering through courses about it at university. Now that I actually know haskell a little, and understand the why behind all those syntax choices, it makes a lot of sense and is a really smart syntax choice.
I like how Flightcaster separates their webfrontend tech with the mapreduce backend. So I probably won't make a full switch. Wonder how many other pythonistas are doing the same.