OK, can we officially end the "_ in _ minutes and _ lines" meme now? While we're at it, let's close out the "check out my startup created in _ hours and $_".
Well, I think/hope that he was sort of making fun of the "in n lines of code" part by putting all his code, besides the imports, on 1 line. But yeah, I agree.
It's kind of a bummer that people feel that these endeavors are worth satire. While the titles may be a bit pithy and perhaps misleading, these X in Y lines tend to be really interesting reading, and let you glimpse into someone else's domain expertise.
It's too bad they didn't just say 210 lines of C and still show it. I would have still checked it out, and been interested.
Well, if you can do it in C, and I can see your solution, and it works, then I can do it in a line of perl. But I didn't test his code, so I don't know if this works:
I think that point was to parody all these "X programmed in Y lines of code, but without all the 'hard' stuff like load-balancing, replication, optimized SQL queries that allow it to scale, etc; that's all too 'hard' so I'll do just the easy stuff and then claim that my final product is exactly the same as X"
I'm not sure why I don't just quit while I'm behind, but what version of OSX and gcc did you build it with? I can't get it even to compile (10.5.8, gcc version 4.0.1).
Is this satire? If not: You know, not that it would mean much anyway but it really doesn't count if you just delete all of the line breaks 'cause you're using a language that doesn't require them.
on proggit there has been a recent fad to reimplement reddit in X lines of Y in Z minutes where X and Z are minimized and it has devolved into a satire, yes.