> They simply do not fathom the ruthlessness of the political or business world.
You can be as ruthless as you want, you're not going to be able to fake the Apollo landings without the Soviets calling you on your bullshit.
Conspiracy theories tend to have massive logical and/or logistical holes. For example, how exactly would you wire the WTC to collapse with nobody noticing? How would you keep everyone quiet? At some point, you're adding epicycles to epicycles, which should tell people something, but never seems to...
> "Proves religion wrong", completely disregarding any psychological or anthropological explanations for such a phenomenon.
Nobody's out to prove religion doesn't exist (which is the only kind of sense I can make out of what you typed), but certain religious claims can be proven wrong, which is the only kind of disproofs I've actually seen.
> Go to any of the hippest (and most expensive) night clubs in a european city and you will meet these kinds of people everywhere, earning huge amounts of money doing dubious business deals or polishing the images of morally questionable partners.
None of this proves the Jew-luminatti are running the world. (Antisemitism is about a millimeter beneath the surface of most of the really interesting conspiracy theories.)
>It is reported that LeMessurier agonized over how to deal with the problem. If he made it known publicly, he risked ruining his professional reputation. He approached the architect (Hugh Stubbins) first, and then Citicorp. He advised them to take swift remedial action. Ultimately he persuaded Citicorp to repair the building without informing the public, a task made easier by the press strike at that time.[3]
and
>Because nothing happened as a result of the engineering gaffe, the danger was kept hidden from the public for almost 20 years. It was publicized in a lengthy article in The New Yorker in 1995.[4]
You can be as ruthless as you want, you're not going to be able to fake the Apollo landings without the Soviets calling you on your bullshit.
Conspiracy theories tend to have massive logical and/or logistical holes. For example, how exactly would you wire the WTC to collapse with nobody noticing? How would you keep everyone quiet? At some point, you're adding epicycles to epicycles, which should tell people something, but never seems to...
> "Proves religion wrong", completely disregarding any psychological or anthropological explanations for such a phenomenon.
Nobody's out to prove religion doesn't exist (which is the only kind of sense I can make out of what you typed), but certain religious claims can be proven wrong, which is the only kind of disproofs I've actually seen.
> Go to any of the hippest (and most expensive) night clubs in a european city and you will meet these kinds of people everywhere, earning huge amounts of money doing dubious business deals or polishing the images of morally questionable partners.
None of this proves the Jew-luminatti are running the world. (Antisemitism is about a millimeter beneath the surface of most of the really interesting conspiracy theories.)