Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I agree. You have to look at the intent of the business. LR's primary use was illicit, whether they explicitely advertised themselves as such or not, they were still out of regulation and obviously not innocent.

Also it's customer, not costumer.




Strong accusations.


No longer accusations when they've been convicted in the court of law to the exact claims made.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: