Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The argument is that when corporations speak, they speak with the voice of the owners of that corporation, and that the amplification the corporation provides is somehow unjustified.

Not that this is any different from anything a company does. No matter how much freedom each employee has, they have no freedom to act against the interest of their employer.




"The argument is that when corporations speak, they speak with the voice of the owners of that corporation, and that the amplification the corporation provides is somehow unjustified."

I wish people would honestly make that argument instead of resorting to the prior ridiculous rhetoric.

"Not that this is any different from anything a company does."

Or any organization.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: