On: What Pythonistas Think of Ruby

[steveklabnik]

And you could use {} instead of do/end, but a Pythonista wouldn't consider that any more terse.

[showell → steveklabnik]

Yep, my mention of do/end or squigglies was just a caveat on the Ruby-is-more-terse-in-this-example statement in the context of anonymous functions or blocks. I wish there was a language that won on both terseness metrics--i.e. a Ruby with indentation or a Python with anonymous functions.