Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"I can" More like "you could".

The point of an insanely complex protocol with zillions of shipped variants is to benefit top to bottom silo manufacturers (apple, etc) while destroying the market for non silo manufacturers.

USB 1 really could charge off almost any port and almost any port could access almost any flash drive. That is being eliminated other than in silo'd ecosystems.

My favorite part of type C is the high voltages, its going to be fun watching Chinese grade cables short and utterly fry and ignite USB connected devices. Much like the fire department inspector gets out of whack about seeing extension cords plugged into extension cords, the inspector of the future is going to condemn office buildings where USB cables are present, of any sort, due to USB-C contamination.




x86 and Unix are insanely complex too and a big part of that complexity has to do with backward compatibility. I've scanned through the specs and I haven't seen any complexity just for the sake of it. Care to point out any specifics? Also note that some of the added complexity is to support new features, such as power provider/consumer switching and power safety.

As for the substandard Chinese grade products, they've always done that and will continue to do it. Bulk of existing USB chargers you find have horrible ripples and have power factors that seem to have been engineered to be embarrassingly low.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: