Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If they are stuck on XP it's not really a choice.

I work for a major European corporation and I am also stuck on XP. We don't exactly have the best in class IT dept (despite claims by a senior IT guy that we have more developpers than google and facebook together... we don't really have much to show for it).




> If they are stuck on XP it's not really a choice.

I never understood why users stuck on XP don't just install a different browser (Chrome or Firefox). You don't have to use IE, especially not in the version is so old it barely works with modern sites.


Because corporate policy says "no Chrome or Firefox Portable for you".


Corporate policy is not a law of physics. It's just some dude that decided something. They can decide something else instead.

Saying that doesn't actually answer the question, it just shifts it to "why would corporate policy say that".


we have more developpers than google and facebook together

That's probably why you can't get anything done (Mythical Man-Month passim)


More than one entity is paying for continual patches for XP -- http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/26/technology/microsoft-windows...


Is it because of an in-house software maintenance problem, or mostly due to being tied to 3rd party software and would have to buy new licenses / migrate?


I think it is a mix of lots of internally developped software which is not compatible, or at least not tested as compatible (and often this software is not developped anymore), cost constrains, and mostly a lot of bureaucracy and glacial-paced processes. I don't think it has to do with third party software.

[edit] in fact if anything third party software is forcing us to upgrade as we see some critical third party software progressively becoming incompatible with XP.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: