The author seems to fail to understand the new social dynamic present in the web. Just because the author fails to find his target audience does not mean these platforms are killing the web. I was a fan but not any more of the mentioned social media, but some of his statements are not insightful.
These platforms are the gateway to a better web not born yet, which is just about to emerge. High-quality content is becoming more relevant.
These social media websites are not killing the web. I'd argue it is doing something that is opposite to killing the web. People can find people who share the same ideologies in the social media platforms described. A decade ago, would you consider the web more prosperous without the presence of these social media platforms? I'd like to think that these platforms are gateway to a better web.
Bloggers are still rock stars in contemporary time. Hossein Derakhshan is just looking at the wrong place.
There is also more competition in the blogging space. What does he think happens when there is an inflow of supply?
People are smarter now. In fact, they are getting really smart with the availability of knowledge, wisdom, skills, and ideas.
If you want more people to read your blog? Better start finding ways to influence new people and affect their lives, while offering meaningful. Furthermore, I hope he finds a way to get the numbers he wants by out-competing other bloggers in his niche.
> Just because the author fails to find his target audience does not mean these platforms are killing the web.
He didn't make that claim, that's a strawman. The social media things are not the normal web anyway. His point isn't complaining about his audience issues, it's about the closed silo nature of these systems that give them massive power as gatekeepers in ways that the normal web doesn't.
> People are smarter now.
Now that's just the rantings of a myopic futurist-cultist.
Was it not implied from reading the whole article?
>social media things are not the normal web anyway.
What is normal? If billions of people are using social media would that not be normal still? How many people have to do a certain behaviour for it to become normal?
>> People can find [other] people who share the same ideologies in the social media platforms described.
It is a close silo.
>Now that's just the rantings of a myopic futurist-cultist.
Now that's just the rantings of a pessimist. How about things like the Flynn effect. Or do you have proof that people are not getting smarter or people are getting dumber?
No, the article was not about him saying he lost his audience. That's the sort of reading that comes from simplistically thinking that everyone is only ever taking any position because of self-interest. Yes, he has a conflict of interest, which was clearly revealed. But the point of the article was about the shift in power, and the concentration of power in the way that the social media networks work. The point has NOTHING to do with his own access to an audience and is all about his concern about imagining the way today's versions of himself (young Iranians writing about issues today) will be limited and controlled to favor commercial interests in ways that were not the case before.
Re: pessimism vs futurism etc., you're the one that made the "people are getting smarter" claim, which is quite bold and demands evidence. I'll grant that it's possible that more percentage of people are getting adequate nutrition, health care, and education such that they are potentially more intelligent, but there's no basis for just asserting that an educated, well-nourished person today is generally any smarter than someone of that status from generations ago. So the curve is more about the percentage of people with decent health and education, and that's not something that leads to a conclusion of ever-increasing future intelligence.
These platforms are the gateway to a better web not born yet, which is just about to emerge. High-quality content is becoming more relevant.
These social media websites are not killing the web. I'd argue it is doing something that is opposite to killing the web. People can find people who share the same ideologies in the social media platforms described. A decade ago, would you consider the web more prosperous without the presence of these social media platforms? I'd like to think that these platforms are gateway to a better web.
Bloggers are still rock stars in contemporary time. Hossein Derakhshan is just looking at the wrong place.
There is also more competition in the blogging space. What does he think happens when there is an inflow of supply?
People are smarter now. In fact, they are getting really smart with the availability of knowledge, wisdom, skills, and ideas. If you want more people to read your blog? Better start finding ways to influence new people and affect their lives, while offering meaningful. Furthermore, I hope he finds a way to get the numbers he wants by out-competing other bloggers in his niche.