I agree with others that suggest website.grader leaves some potentially important analysis off the report. This service is obviously similar, but as much as I like website.grader, I've long thought there is room for improvement, and I think you may be moving in the right direction.
I'm curious what you're doing to populate the "popular pages" section of the site. The site I tried isn't heavily trafficed so maybe that makes it more difficult but those certainly aren't the most popular pages on the site.
Also, may I suggest that you have a native English speaker or experienced writer proofread the "help" copy? (I hope I'm not assuming to much when I guess that the writer is not a native English speaker.) There is a lot of good information there, but some of the entries have spelling or grammatical errors, or are simply awkwardly phrased. For example: "If the Google's cache of the website lack text or links, it means there's a programming problem."
I'm curious what you're doing to populate the "popular pages" section of the site. The site I tried isn't heavily trafficed so maybe that makes it more difficult but those certainly aren't the most popular pages on the site.
Also, may I suggest that you have a native English speaker or experienced writer proofread the "help" copy? (I hope I'm not assuming to much when I guess that the writer is not a native English speaker.) There is a lot of good information there, but some of the entries have spelling or grammatical errors, or are simply awkwardly phrased. For example: "If the Google's cache of the website lack text or links, it means there's a programming problem."