Can anyone explain the downvotes ?
Surely my point is valid even if couched in the sarcasm of devils advocacy - are sarcasm tags needed ?
A democracy cannot function without an informed public.
The press has traditionally been seen as the main guarantor of keeping people informed.
Creating a paywall is exclusiory to the less well off.
This therefore makes the United States less democratic.
Can I please be argued with rather than downvoted or is there no such thing as netiquette these days ?
A democracy cannot function without an informed public. The press has traditionally been seen as the main guarantor of keeping people informed. Creating a paywall is exclusiory to the less well off. This therefore makes the United States less democratic.
Can I please be argued with rather than downvoted or is there no such thing as netiquette these days ?