Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems a joke but is also, sadly, a fact. Chrome bookmarks manager is lightspeed if compared to Firefox, to not mention total lack of usability on Firefox's part, so 1995.



I was against them writing significant portions of Firefox in Javascript from the beginning. Maybe a generator from JS to native for templating interfaces or something. I could see some compromise to aid the web crowd in extending Firefox. Shouldn't be what's running, though, given the inefficiency.


Chrome bookmark manager stores a lot less though.


Is there a limit on it or something?


I meant meta data, Firefox has tags and more time information IIRC, thus does more and thus is prone to be "slower".


Ahh. That makes sense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: