Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Hydro is also relatively clean

Hydro is the most environmentally destructive source of power. It ruins more natural habitat than strip mining coal, clearcutting forests, solar PV in virgin land, or any other kind of generation. And the river bottoms and canyons it destroys are among the most biodiverse habitats in the world before their destruction.




It's all relative. From Wikipedia[1]:

   In 2013 the plant generated a record 98.6 TWh,
   supplying approximately 75% of the electricity
   consumed by Paraguay and 17% of that consumed
   by Brazil.
I'm sure that most of the citizens of Paraguay and Brazil will gladly accept this inexpensive hydro power, even at the loss of a few flooded canyons.

It's nice to sit in ivory towers and criticize. In the real world, many many people's lives are made much easier and more productive by harnessing this inexpensive hydro power.

You want to solve some real problems in Brazil, figure out how to stop the destruction of the Amazon rain forest. That, there, is a world scale tragedy. Not so the beautiful Itaipu Dam, which I've toured, and which helps so many Brazilians.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itaipu_Dam


It's also a massive producer of greenhouse gasses.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046-hydroelectric-po...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: