Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The effect of an unreliable or malicious leader is fewer transactions than possible or unfair prioritization of transactions, but limited to a single (10 minute) block. Seems like if it were an uncommon event it should be not-very-consequential.

Then again, if the lottery likelihood is a function of hashing power then maybe it's not so well distributed.




But if the leader signs conflicting transactions, which wins?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: