Doesn't change the fact that there are more mass shootings than ever before. As a gun owner myself I am almost at the point of giving up defending gun rights. This is getting ridiculous.
If the overall rate is down, why does it matter if mass shootings are up?
The Wikipedia definition is any multiple shooting, which can include 4 or more casualties. That's the bodycount of like a solid car accident, and yet we're not banning cars yet, now are we?
The concern on my end is that of course there are tons of people out there who will do nothing wrong. I have a couple rifles and handguns. I don't hunt. I go to the range once in a while--that's about it. I don't bother anyone and nobody bothers me. This is likely the majority.
Unfortunately, our current laws are currently not working and with the conversation constantly turning to mental illness after a shooting (while it may have something to do with it of course) we see the anger about what happened die down over time with no changes made regarding gun laws or mental illness and how it relates to background checks. This cannot continue.
I don't care if a solution manifests as more laws around background checks or something else but our current situation is clearly a complete and utter failure.
The default reaction from any sane person is always "Something has to be done" -- but that "something" is not easy to come up with. A knee jerk reaction to do "something" just because "something" needs to be done can have far reaching and dire consequences. We need a plan, and we need to know that this plan will actually have an impact and make a difference, not just take rights away from people. Emotion must be taken out of the equation.
Exactly. People are going to die no matter what you do. If you magically were able to get rid of every single gun, mass murders would still happen. So don't think of getting rid of guns as stopping mass murders.
