Thanks. So is rudely telling someone that they "went off on some pointless irrelevant rant" and introducing pointless flamewar material in the response before that.
Instead of playing back at them, I guess I'll just post the rules next time.
- "Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity."
- "Please avoid introducing classic flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say about them."
It is irrelevant this year. Next year it'll ship on tens of millions of PC's. It's certainly not a deal breaker but it would have been a nice to have this year on a small form factor device.
It also doubles the throughput of the older standard.
It's a $1500 device so people who buy it will probably be using it in 4-5 years. I'd rather spend $20 on an adapter cable now and be able to support the better standard next year.
So you'll get it next year then. I don't get why you have to be a prick about it though by saying that Apple or Google are somehow "more progressive" and then turn around and call someone else's response irrelevant and pointless when you just admitted that your entire concern is basically irrelevant right now.
Because no devices require USB-C yet? Regular USB stuff isn't going to just disappear, so it's really not that big a deal. It's like not having a bluray drive or a 3d-tv screen - nobody cares.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2478157,00.asp
http://www.androidcentral.com/google-says-look-out-more-usb-...
USB-C is an open standard that is not controlled by Apple.