Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's relatively trivial to outsource. It's one of those services that's easy to measure, quantify, and manage (from an outsourced perspective). There's also a bit more to it then that. The Anycast routing can be quite difficult to setup and maintain. It's virtually useless outside of a very small set of protocols (DNS being one of them), so it wouldn't make sense for Amazon to bring that kind of talent in-house for something like DNS.



The Anycast routing can be quite difficult to setup and maintain.

Anycast's not particularly difficult to setup and maintain.


the mistake was outsourcing to only one provider. it's easy enough to setup a BIND slave elsewhere that automatically transfers the zone from your primary provider.


I'm not sure that "setup a BIND slave" is quite that easy for someone with as much traffic as Amazon.com.


I'm sure they could hire the muscle to do it.

I'm just saying, relying on just one company is usually a bad idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: