The actual study:
Reeck, C., & LaBar, K. S. (2024). Reining in regret: emotion regulation modulates regret in decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2357847
The Acorn-designed ARMs were released in the late 1980s and very early 1990s. The best-selling designs are the recent ones which do share heritage but are far removed from the excellent work that Furber, Wilson and team did while at Acorn.
RISC OS is a plaything for enthusiasts, a relic if an age where computing was a hobby rather than the corporate monstrosity that it has become.
As a hobbyist and RISC OS user I am fine with that. But Acorn itself got out of the game in 1988 after Phoebe took only 1,400 preorders. Had they continued, Galileo may well have succeeded RISC OS with a more modern foundation.
The ability to assign memory to various aspects of the system dynamically by dragging bar charts is something I wish existed in modern operating systems. Sheer UX genius. I wonder who came up with it?
Acorn did the reference profile NC for Oracle, and it was an ARM7-based machine with NCOS, a stripped down version of RISC OS. The Acorn-built NCs were then sold under a variety of brandings, including Acorn's own and Xemplar (the Acorn/Apple education collaboration in the UK). Was the Oracle Network Computer a later variant?
The main limitations of the multitasking command window were that it couldn't be used to drop into a language like the inbuilt BASIC interpreter and then change screen modes in BASIC code, or draw graphics using the BASIC plotting keywords, and so on. The command-line UI foreground and background colours were configured in the host app (typically Edit) rather than being changeable dynamically from within the command-line environment. There may be other limitations that I am not aware of, but for text-based interaction with typical command-line tools or BASIC in text-only mode, it's fine.
