> Verbosity is so much worst than syntax complexity because you ends up having dozens of different patterns that do the same thing overall but with subtile differences on edge cases.
So vague.
> As long as you introduce syntax to help with what people are actually doing (and not juste because it looks cool) syntax addition enhance the code readability.
So you are saying Rust's syntax is doing just right. But this has nothing to do with other language design. Just open your mind.
An authorization protocol like OAuth. By means of e-mail, people can contact the service provider too. Similar tools include mobile phones, accounts on Facebook/Google/Twitter/etc. but many will also require us to provide an e-mail address for password recovery.
No, it's not designed to be anonymous (although it will force encryption). The goal is to provide a free, community hosted email service to regular non-technical users.
It is similar to TOR in the sense that it will rely on volunteers to host nodes and/or relays. The goals of TMail and TOR are, however, fundamentally different.
After some experience with Factor (a very interesting concatenative language with great C FFI support), I think Red is the next exciting language for me to try. Just waiting for the I/O module. :)
So vague.
> As long as you introduce syntax to help with what people are actually doing (and not juste because it looks cool) syntax addition enhance the code readability.
So you are saying Rust's syntax is doing just right. But this has nothing to do with other language design. Just open your mind.