Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vaadu's comments login

"The size of a small city, it is the largest, most secret, most powerful, and most intrusive spy organization ever created."

Is it more intrusive than the KGB, Stasi or Chinese state security? Cite your source.

BTW, this story is from 2 months ago.


Congress are the elected bureaucrats Agency folks are unelected bureaucrats


The purpose of Congress is to make these kinds of decisions. They pass the buck so they don't have a voting record that an election opponent can use against them.

They need to do their job.


Unfortunately saying they need to do their job will not make it so


This decision has more to do with the Court owning its own past mistake, where they deferred to executive agencies. But both the judiciary and the legislative enabled the executive to consolidate lawmaking and interpretive power, thus violating the separation (and balance) of powers. Overruling Chevron is a step in the direction of restoring the balance of power. The balance may never be perfect, but at least we can see when we're far off course and make a correction.


Lehto's Law discussed this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ntxd2jsszi0&pp=ygULbGVodG8nc...

The builder didn't help himself by suing everyone before trying to work it out.


Money sniffing dogs? They train dogs to sniff for plants, food and drugs. Cash in baggage should be easy?


But cash is everywhere, and it's not illegal to have it in your luggage if declared or below a certain amount. Seems like you'd get a ton of false positives as it would be very difficult to train a dog to only alert if it smells a lot of cash. But I did read another article that said they sprayed their vacuum packed cash bags with coffee and air freshener - don't know if that works that well against cash sniffing dogs.


Maybe cash sniffing elephants. Elephants can count, or at least scale, obscured items by smell.


Implement something similar to that used to sort out green tomatoes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOTaNK-8LYY&t=2s


The problem is that that’s essentially what most “facial recognition” systems used for law enforcement and adjacent do: they filter by skin color - false positives are overwhelmingly black.


In that case, they can use human review before accusing anyone.


This could be reasonable policy if the police in the US didn't have racial bias in enforcement. It's not even historically


Photographic equipment “accidentally” being bad at taking pictures of dark skinned people- the more things change, the more they stay the same


Why would the false positives be overwhelmingly black unless the fare jumpers are also overwhelmingly black?


The Atlantic council is holding Trudeau's strings?


The banning of TicTok is a first step. The government and elites don't like NOT having the monopoly on persuasion. Telegram, Signal and X will follow.


> X will follow.

Twitter censors on behalf of governments all over the world. What on Earth makes you think that it's some bastion of resistance?


The lawyers in the NYPD that signed off on the subpoena should face ethics charges. There seems to be no gray area here on multiple levels. The NYPD knew it wasn't a valid subpoena and they told X not to inform the account holder.


And then there’s the fact that the employment gains for October and November were both revised downward in the latest report. "The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for October was revised down by 45,000, from +150,000 to +105,000, and the change for November was revised down by 26,000, from +199,000 to +173,000. With these revisions, employment in October and November combined is 71,000 lower than previously reported."

Zero Hedge https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/inside-catastrophic-jobs-r... points out that this trend is deeply concerning because the job gains for 10 of the last 11 months of 2023 have all been revised downward. “Why? So that the White House can take credit for a strong number (one which also sparks algorithmic buying in the market) only to quietly revise it lower one and two months later when nobody is looking."

But here’s where things look really bad. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t09.htm According to the BLS, the number of full-time workers went from 134,727,000 in November to 133,196,000 in December. That’s a whopping 1.531 million decline.

There’s another dirty secret lingering in the data.

Next we turn to the numbers behind the headline job prints which were rather terrible: the monthly nonfarm payrolls (from the Establishment Survey) may have been weak at 216K but the far more accurate Household Survey showed that the number of Employed workers actually collapsed by an unprecedented 683K, the biggest drop since the US economy was shutdown by covid!

"In short: December was a catastrophic month for the jobs market, which is why we expect the usual theater: non-stop spin and lies from the Biden admin, and not a single relevant question from the liberal media whose job is not to educate or inform, but to carry water, spread lies and enable propaganda,” observes Zero Hedge.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: