Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | user555555555's comments login

I kind of wish the startups would direct-list on the stock market, and then the early employees have liquidity from the start. This doesn't stop the company raising more money if they're young, they can still issue shares. I'm guessing that theres some downsides to this that I'm not seeing, anyone know?


Once a stock has at least 2,000 acredited shareholders or 500 unacredited shareholders (was 500 shareholders without regard to acreditation before the 2012 Jobs Act), SEC disclosure requirements apply the same as if had IPOd. Allowing/encouraging trading of the stock is going accelerate the time that that happens. Facebook aproaching the shareholder limit was one of the things that pushed them to IPO --- might as well raise some money if you have to prepare all the disclosures and follow all the accounting rules, anyway.


Good luck making a group of children all wear a mask all of the time


"American countries"?


I meant companies

But given the companies we’re talking about maybe subconsciously I meant what I wrote


s/American countries/client states


Sorry the EU


That does sound easier, is there a higher birth rate in that area?


It has, but mostly from immigrants or poor families. Middle class families are still barely having one child or none at all.


Did anyone really think the stock was going to rocket up?


Yes, everyone who went long on the day of the IPO.


Is there any downside to joining that lawsuit if you qualify?


It's a class action, so it depends if it's opt-out or opt-in. If it's opt-out, you'll be in the class by not taking any action. The downside to class actions is usually that you can't sue on your own. You might also disagree with the merits of the case, so there could be an ethical concern on your end. You also might not like how much your lawyer is getting paid.


If you still work there, potential retaliation


SV Blacklist


How does this compare with the flatpak/snap strategy of mounting a filesystem?


flatpak/snap still rely on libraries. This only relies on filesystem features and kernel functions which are, for all intents and purposes, 'static' (because of the "Never break userspace" policy). As such, the resulting binaries (stripped of GNU_* symbols) can run on a musl system. I've had a lot of trouble getting flatpak programs to run on my musl system.


Can you provide a link to where it says they have actually droped support.

In that link they describe how to make a firmlink, its seems like they have a way to just keep doing their thing as before

(edit, reworded)


It's FUD


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: