Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | teoruiz's comments login

Honest question: why are houses in the US primarily built with wood? Is it just because it’s cheaper?

Even if it’s cheaper, is it worth to have a cheaper but obviously less durable building when compared to brick and mortar?

It’s always been baffling for my southern European mind.


Depends on where you are in the US. There are a lot of brick and stone buildings in the northeast. Florida because of hurricanes they tend to build houses out of cinder block. In California because of earthquakes they tend not to build with masonry.

That said the US historically had a lot of wood. Most everywhere. So it was cheap and light[1] easy to transport. And wood if it's kept dry is durable. My house is 70 years old. The wood framing is totally solid. Previous house is 115 years old. The framing is also solid.

[1] House built of wood is probably 1/4 the weight of a house built of masonry.


It goes up much quicker and requires less highly skilled tradesman to build and to maintain.

There are new developments in the states where they produce the frames for the various housing 'templates' off-site, and then ship it to the plots and build the house there, almost like a lego kit.


A wood frame is much better in earthquakes; it just happily flexes. Steel is an alternative but until the plague was more expensive than wood.


At least in my area, brick houses are actually less durable because they crack on our shifty soils


I'm from the suburbs of Chicago and brick and mortar are very very normal there.


For my gf (in the usa), it's aesthetics. Though I look at brick and think "longevity." Perhaps historically it was cheaper/easier to use local wood and that image stuck with people?


Nothing is built with brick anymore. If you see a newer than 1940s brick house, its a stick frame (wood) with a layer of brick outside it for aesthetics. Also people associate brick with longevity, but as several of my friends in old ass brick row homes, their foundations are crumbling, and are usually in need of serious structural repair. Brick isnt bomb proof like people think it is. Its even more susceptible to long term stress from wind shear.


Relic from boom after WW2, many houses needed to be build fast.


> * ECS: Two containers can not use same port on same node. Anti pattern to containers.

That's solved if you use Application Load Balancer instead of ELB classic for your ECS service.


Is there any indication the vulnerability is present on Intel-based Macs?


It's not present because Macs don't have AMT.


There's been a plenty of Macs with vPRO CPUs. Unless Apple is getting custom CPUs or CPU firmware then it would seem that Macs do have AMT. No?

Enabling it is tremendously difficult though AFAIK.


It has to have the ME silicon and the AMT enabled firmware. According to Matthew Garrett, who I'd generally trust on this stuff, Apple hasn't ever shipped AMT-enabled firmware.


It's nice to see that for once it's a good thing that Apple hardly ever ships standard firmware and instead usually leaves out all the components and features they don't plan to use.


vPro isn't a CPU, it's a particular combination of CPU, PCH (southbridge), Intel NIC/WiFi, and AMT firmware. There's no evidence that Macs have AMT or vPro.


Well, Intel does a particularly bad job of explaining whether this exists. My MBP CPU is a Core(TM) i7-4850HQ, and Intel's ark site says it has vPro.


You're right about that. Intel's product lineup is a huge mishmash of optional features that no one understands and now it's going to bite them. (But not really, because what else are you going to buy? A Ryzen laptop?)


I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be. However it doesn't seem immediately clear whether or not it'd be exploitable under default configs.


Exactly the same right now from Spain. It seems the attackers are now targeting Dyn's European servers.


Try with `brew upgrade git`


How long will it take for the CA to be distributed to a large enough browser base?

I mean, it could be years. Is there any other, speedier process? (cross-signing, for instance).


8 to 12+ months for it to be in a release version of Firefox. https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:How_to_apply#Timeline and https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA document the process in great detail.


Does that go for new root certificates as well?


I joined a startup wholly-owned by GOWEX 5 months ago. A startup that is now defunct.

I know it sounds crazy but we all believed those numbers, we were happy, money everywhere.

But from time to time one of my mental alarms would go off, and I would just ignore it. "What could possibly be wrong with this company? It's a publicly-traded company, after all."

The moral of the story is: pay attention to your instincts.


"I know it sounds crazy but we all believed those numbers, we were happy, money everywhere.

... 'What could possibly be wrong with this company? It's a publicly-traded company, after all.'"

Sounds like we've already forgotten about Enron[1]. They seemed to be rolling in cash, were hyped by Wall Street analysts and the media, etc. How could it all have been a scam?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal


The first time around you curled "www.trucrypt.org" (note the missing "e") and it went to a domain parking service (findingresult.com).

The second time you went to the real "www.truecrypt.org", which is the real domain that now redirects to SF.


I would absolutely love subscribing to that list, would you be open to share the Spotify link?

Thanks!


Here's what I've got, grouped by broad swaths of BWV numbers:

* 1-224 (cantatas): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/0RkVeCJ3iMVc1My...

* 225-524 (various works, mostly vocal, sorta dull in the 300s): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/2sCCwEMpTXPsOBa...

* 525-771 (organ works): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/1aGTiGWlnSiGNcJ...

* 772-994 (mostly keyboard works): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/4ka3cJd5UCg5EoJ...

* 995-1080 (solo suites and complicated stuff): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/4v8NejHWIKDDSmc...

* 1081-1128 (discovered since the 1950s): http://open.spotify.com/user/rspeer/playlist/5dmTRLVqUi8dB0M...

Of course this isn't close to finished. I'm guessing it would take a year or so, given the rate that I listen to Bach while working.


Thanks so much for sharing these. I subscribed and have been listening since Friday.

I noticed yesterday that some of my favorites are no longer there. Have some pieces been removed since Friday?

Some of the pieces from AllOfBach.com were there, as well as the concertos "after vivaldi". Can't find them now. Thanks so much!


I do shuffle around pieces because I'm trying to pick the version I like the best. I don't think I'm removing that much overall, but this is a work in progress.

I also decided to fact-check myself after posting the links, so I deleted some things that multiple sources say are spurious (not by J. S. Bach at all). If all of those happened to be your favorites, it might be that there's another Baroque composer you like better than Bach that you should look for!


Thanks a lot. Subscribed to all!


I find the Toccata and Fugue just amazing to watch and listen, an the performer is even adorable.

http://allofbach.com/en/bwv/bwv-565/detail/


One wo/man's adorable is another wo/man's tiresome. :-) But he's good, the organ is beautiful, and the production quality is fantastic.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: