Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | taintlove's comments login

>>I find it hard to believe that television or other advertising for a product like Coke or Pepsi makes a big difference in sales. I'm already aware of the products, I already have my opinions on them, and they aren't going to change them.

Companies don't engage in the marketing bombardment of certain brands to remind you that they exist or to change your opinion. For 'commoditized' consumer products like cola or light beer, there is a premium placed on being 'top of mind.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_of_mind

I am not a frequent consumer of soda or light beer. However, on occasion, when I 'have to' purchase it (for a party, picnic, barbeque, etc.), I find myself subconsciously steered towards certain brands. which I believe is the result of years of 'conditioning' from constant immersion in uqiquitous marketing.

>>If these companies stopped advertising tomorrow I don't think there would be an immediate effect on consumer behavior.

Not immediately, but in due time absolutely. Why else would Coca-Cola spend $11 billion on marketing last year? http://beta.fool.com/stockcroc1/2012/04/13/coca-colas-new-co...


This would work only on mobile-only web sites. I for one would be incredibly irritated if I were to, say, write a longass comment and then accidentally swipe up on my trackpad and lose 20 minutes of work. I've done it before in other stupid ways, it's very frustrating, and i just end up being too fed up to type up my thoughts again


Whenever I hear about something like this (eg, 'the uncrashable computer' or the 'indestructible drinking glass') it begs the question - what about one of the greatest misnomers of all? The Unsinkable Ship, her royal majesty's Titanic


George V was on the throne then. So if it were a royal ship, which it wasn't, then it would be his majesty's ship Titanic (HMS Titanic).

The prefix RMS which was used for the Titanic means Royal Mail Ship. i.e. it delivered mail.

</pedant>


sadly, EA is ruining what looks like an otherwise very promising game with DRM and DLC


I don't think they're ruining it. Some people don't care about DRM / DLC with gaming (like myself). I just want the best possible gaming experience.


Yeah, until they shutdown the server shortly after the next Sim City is released, making your old game unless. EA has a habit of doing things like that.


That's a good point, but by then I probably won't still be playing the game.


The last two sentences you wrote are incompatible.


I usually play Sim City by finding the unlimited money cheat and getting a large amount of money before I start. I can then build whatever I want. I enjoy the city design part of the game, not the economic part.

I doubt that this way of playing will be possible in the new Sim City.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: