Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | phabora's comments login

Small business is just a propaganda tool. The idea has some allure, maybe because it reminds Americans of their priomordial beginning as settlers, homesteaders, yeomans, craftsmen (or so the stories go).


Could you please stop creating accounts for every few comments you post? We ban accounts that do that. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

You needn't use your real name, of course, but for HN to be a community, users need some identity for other users to relate to. Otherwise we may as well have no usernames and no community, and that would be a different kind of forum. https://hn.algolia.com/?query=community%20identity%20by:dang...


In real numbers most businesses in the US are "small businesses" because they have 500 or fewer employees. It says nothing about their financials though. A hedge fund managing billions of dollars, a start up with millions in VC funding, and a mom and pop florist are all "small businesses".

I'm definitely not disagreeing "small business" has been turned into a propaganda term. That process was helped by the silly tax classification of what's a "small business". A lot of marketing dollars go into making people think the mom and pop florist when they hear the term and not the hedge fund.


There's also the allure of the local restaurant/store/etc versus the national chain, that everyone can see all around them even in the present day.


Small business vs Big tech. A clever diversion.


We all agree about what taxes are. Some just attach more libertarian sensibilities/fears/paranoia to that word.


Your dream has two outcomes:

1. You get outcompeted by other companies that look out for Number One, namely the bottom line

2. You get surrounded by an entourage of corporate sycophants that nurture your lie about how your company is so benevolent that no worker representation is necessary


High-performers (read: well-payed workers) like to complain about the nefarious corrupting influence of unions but seldom consider the case that the high-performers (read: upper-middle class) might have a vested interest in the corrupt status quo where the majority of workers facilitate their high-performing (read: privileged) lifestyles.


I mean all the anecdotes I have come from electricians and county paid groundskeepers and who also happen to be my close friends so I'd have to say your assertion if not false in totality is false in this case for certain.

Edit: Oh and a general contractor or two.


My mistake. I thought you were upper-middle class.


I am, but my friends are not and they are where I've formed my opinion on unions. I don't sort myself on my money, that is a poor way to choose all of your friends.


You are confusing skill with access to capital.


Yes, for shame! When will America get to hear the side of the employer?

Mabye the executive of Amazon could be allowed to post a little column in paper like the Washington Post. Maybe the owner of that paper wouldn’t object to that idea.


The meaning is pretty straightforward to interpret.

Vampires suck blood.


Not really euphemism. More of an Orwellian term.


Some people are privileged enough to be able to get jobs where they don’t need collective bargaining to get decently fair compensation and decent working conditions.


> ethics

Debatable.


Do you have a lot of experience with multiple EU countries?[1] Or are you just using “outsized influence” to extrapolate that non-English speaking countries can be neatly categorized as being a homogeneous contrast to English-speaking countries?

[1] The only anglophone EU country is Ireland.


> Do you have a lot of experience with multiple EU countries?

Yes.

> The only anglophone EU country is Ireland.

Technically, though I would still tend to think of the UK here too given the recent-ness of its membership.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: