Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | peterjussi's comments login

Companies just plan for redundancy in roles so they are ready when people need to take parental leave or sabbaticals. It isn't that difficult for a company to handle, but companies in countries where this isn't the norm just plan and hire for it.


Right, the main difference there would be that the changes get combined into one squash commit rather than a merge commit. Mostly an aesthetic choice, so I could definitely see both as viable.

If I wanted to move changes between branches I would probably prefer a squash rather than a regular merge, as that will look cleaner in the history.


This sounds like a Product Owner to me. Indeed, all these types of roles are pretty much interchangeable depending on the exact structure of your teams.


Except I'm used to thinking that "product owner" is definitely not a technical role. It is for you? It's possible anything really can mean anything.


Causality.


I would even say: in every case, except where a GPU or TPU is necessary to achieve a certain speed. Unless there are very specific reasons for it, GPU/TPU is just unnecessarily cost inefficient.


The actual dataset from the paper: https://voice.mozilla.org/en/datasets


I wouldn't count on it. As long as the product is available and marketed in other countries they can get caught in legal issues for not following those countries laws relating to marketing and offering of products.


Darktable is open source, though; it's not really offering a commercial product. Besides, what will eurocrats do if they determine a copyright issue? It's not as though there will be any earnings to garnish, worst-case scenario. If I (an American) publish a software project, Euro trademark law doesn't apply to me.


Legally does it really matter what is your specific price point or development model? Also it does nor matter what is your residency, if you publish it in Europe (or country X) then at least in theory you need to follow the local laws. How/if these would be enforced is another question. And yes I know your publishing tool probably does not even give you much control to which countries you start to export your product once you click Publish. Or is there any such at all?


I don't see why cashless must mean non-anonymous. There are chargeable payment cards around the world that effectively are anonymous and cashless.


This is a thing for many older big companies in Japan


I'm not sure about this, but it seems that the Japanese Dean and DeLuca is just a Japanese company owning and operating the brand under license or joint venture. This is how a lot of foreign brands enter Japan (for example, Taco Bell and Baskin Robbins), and why many remain even when the original company more or less goes under (for example, Mister Donut). I wouldn't be surprised if this ends up being the same.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: