Because the master can even hit the seagull with his Slingshot, that the Corp. H.Q. will not say anything to make him angry and make him think about the others H.Q.s that exist and make him wonder the salary there.
Here sounds infinite loop maybe, but it should finishing calling each other (a calling b that calls a that calls b again...infinite...)
But when there is a Top maximum Parent that is the top of the parent child pyramid (like a html Body "div", I mean, the one that contains all others") It should stop...well
def a
self.insert //something to make it child of the parent, like a html structure maybe
b //call the second method, the b method below
end
def b
self.insert //same here, same logic//
a //call the first method, the a method above
end
thisHtmlDiv.a //crazy example
So the subject on which you call the method will be added in all the hierarchy chain of the parent child pyramid.
Thank you very much , sincerely, jeromebaek. This is the real nice spirit of Hackernwes, and you are one of the heroes who help pass the good Knowledge. Thank you very much, buddy.
So , the maximum you can get from it is the console log text return of the script you paste there. right? Or you can glue your script with anything like webgl or canvas there to do anything?
I imagine that is some sort of intentional sandboxing? I didn't know about that and find myself surprised. In principal I'm not sure why it wouldn't be able to provide direct DOM access. I'd love to hear more background on this if you know it.
Because a clone is criminal. As long as I know. And is not only against the law, It is morally theft,
some people spent A Lot of money in design for some malicious smartass chinese guy to come and copy and sell by 10 times cheaper....This is Absurd. Some people are loosing their jobs , see , maybe me myself, i am loosing a job because of Falsification...
Besides, Is not really necessary, Come one, people should come out with their Own watch design right?
It should be not so hard to draw a sketch with a New design, right? Its not like painting the Davinci's Monalisa, right...
At least my opinion, like they say in the Good Wife Series.
> Because a clone is criminal. As long as I know. And is not only against the law, It is morally theft,
I just want to respond to this because we see a lot of the same comments in the software industry and I think it dilutes the meaning of the law to speak imprecisely.
If you make a watch and put a brand name on it for which you have no license, that is a trade mark infringement. It is illegal in most countries. It is not theft. Theft is where you take something that belongs to someone else, thereby depriving them of it. Infringement is where you use something that belongs to someone else, often without depriving them of it. They are different things, both legally and morally.
There are design patents, and I suspect that there are probably design patents for watches (although I've never looked). If you copy a design that is patented for which you have no license, you are infringing the patent. This is illegal in most parts of the world (but probably different parts of the world than trademark infringement). It is also infringement, not theft.
Fashion designs can not by copyrighted under most (all?) international treaties. If you make a watch that looks similar to another watch, but that does not infringe the trademark, nor infringe any design patents, then you are not infringing at all. It is neither illegal, nor immoral (IMHO anyway) to do this. However, it may be fraud if you try to pass it off as something it is not, which is illegal, of course.
Karl Lagerfeld, the famous designer had an interesting comment about look-a-like copies. When prompted in an interview (unfortunately I can't remember which programme it was on) for his opinion about people who buy knock bags he replied something to the effect of, "Those people are not my customers. None of my customers would buy those bags. Neither would customers who are happy with a knock off bag want to buy my bags. It makes no difference to me". As much as I realise that not everybody will have such an expansive point of view, I've always thought it to be an incredibly wise position to take in the fashion industry.
What's the margin of the watch itself (factory, labor, etc vs cost) not their overall operating margins as a company?
And is that 16% margin due to "R&D" eating into them?
Or do they calculate their margins after hefty executive bonuses, lavish corporate offices, and other "expenses"? Not to mention that they also run all kind of boutique shops of their own and venture into various areas outside watches.
>Some people are loosing their jobs , see , maybe me myself, i am loosing a job because of Falsification...
Serves them right, since most of the "high end watch" industry is selling 10x overpriced items to rich show-offs and overpaying suckers.
I'm not talking one-of-a-kind, manually crafted pieces with valuable materials here. I'm talking even the "low end" 2-10K watches, with BS generic mechanisms, and costing nowhere near that to make.
>Some people are loosing their jobs , see , maybe me myself, i am loosing a job because of Falsification...
Who exactly is losing their job because of fake watches? I do not believe that you will be able to present any convincing evidence that replica watches are actually hurting the sales of genuine watches.
>Lot of money in design for some malicious smartass chinese guy to come and copy and sell by 10 times cheaper
What do you think about homage watches? Most people don't seem to have a problem with those, the guy in the youtube video specifically says homage watches are OK.
You're wrong, they infiltrate the supply chain, and catch unsuspecting consumers trying to buy the real thing. There are fakes all over chrono24, fake SARB017's recently found on Amazon, and there are a ton of fake Casio F-91W's.
These shoes/equips remember me some Genetic Algorithm Simulations of "Kangaroos" , some of them had only 1 leg, some had 2, They were made to fuel prototypes of hardware robots that run like a chicken or jump like a Kangaroo.
These robots were scary Impressive! And run Scary fast. And Jump some mortal loops and flip-flops and stuff.
This was 25 years ago now. 25 years!
Therefore... those bionic Dogs from google or darpa , whoever, were supposed to be a normal thing 20 years ago, If someone back then let himself be taken by the Hype, and by 2020 everyone should be wearing Exo-Skeletons like the iron-man.
>using "s" for latin plural, lets evolve English a bit
...collection of LXXII artifactorum...
Perhaps off topic from the paper but it's clear there is at least one category of game that gives the user a particular world view.
People who have played Civilization have a very distinctive view of world history and social forces generally. I'm sure Sid Meyer was just maximizing fun and it's certainly not propagandist. But maybe it shows that abuse is theoretically possible. (Although it's hard to think historical simulations have audiences big enough worth targeting.)
Oh my god , that was funny man... Don't know why remembered me the good short Lannister. He is a master of humor, I have to say. I imagined him saying "artifactorum"
But maybe I was wrong, phenomenons or phenomena, this probably greek and not latin, but with "s" is easier :D
Runescape has a pretty old player-base at this point, mostly because the only people who play it any more are people who played it when they were younger
I want until the topic is dead to confess I was too overly old to play already when the player base was all most kids. haha
So, even for today standards, I would be the oldest there. But they banned my acc by mistake and I never cheated so I never will play anymore, i mean, only after I buy the company if I feel inclined and fire whoever the inconpetent who banned my acc.
Really never never cheated...All hand-made sweat Grinding...Its was unfair and very saddening.
"light will go red and a machine operator will come an poke it for a bit until it works again"
This was exactly what I remember, and literally the guy will take a tool that is not a hammer, a screw-wrench, and hit the shit out of the machine like it was a hammer, and then loose some screw, and then bang-bang again, and then tighten some other screw...
Even the young, like 26 y.o. guy , from faraway Sichuan Province thats works doing this will receive a respectul title...
... and will be called a "Gong" (engineer) For example, if the guy's name is Zhao, he will be called with respect even by the bilionaire owner of the factory with the name and title: "Zhao Gong".
Some old Eletric/industrial design like 66 years old are making good bucks still kicking, no one is at Key West drinking margheritas...
