Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nuthje's comments login

The sides were cut to fit a place in the old city hall (now palace) on Dam square in 1715.


It is for the passengers.


Which things? Based on what data? You're asking for data to substantiate your statement -- maybe first have the data?


I gather it's a way of saying it's climate controlled, i.e. heated or cooled depending on the season. I suppose as a contrast to calling any semi-random outside space the largest reading space.


Their commercial offering is advertisement, which seems to be liked.


Does it? All the stuff I've read complains about abysmal performance on Facebook and how it's money spent poorly unless you're trying to scam naive consumers.

There was a time where I'd see Coca cola advertising on Facebook. That time is gone.

Last post from coca cola is August 2022 https://m.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=100064359142431

The number of top tier brands engaging is going down


I just opened Facebook to see what I’d see on the app, and just a couple of scrolls gave me: Planet Fitness, Expedia and a bunch of airline ads.

People will always complain how something doesn’t work, how they pulled out their ad money and etc. But then you see ad spend growth on every big platform.


It's a simple equation: Money spent on ads will go where the users (ears and eyeballs) are. By providing fine-grained targeting an advertising platform can extract more money from "the long end of the tail" which is where most of the money lives.

The rule for selling ads is: Know your users.

The rule for buying ads is: Know their users.


You're using a brand advertiser as an example when you should be using direct response advertiser as your example. Brand advertisers pay the least since their advertising is predicated on reaching a lot of people cheaply multiple times while direct advertisers pay the most since their advertising is predicated on getting people to convert immediately and judge their return accordingly.

The fact that you don't see Coca Cola ads means that Meta is able to find advertisers willing to pay more than them to reach you that you are more likely to convert immediately on.


weirdly, for my link that redirected to my countries' local coca-cola facebook brand page (denmark) which has its latest post 1 hour ago (8th feb 2023). I didnt know that kind of location-based redirect was a thing on facebook, interesting.


Plenty of brands still advertise om Instagram.


Some great suggestions, but even the cheapest alternative is 100% more expensive than a Blue Yeti. The recommended one is 400% more expensive. Meh.


By cheapest alternative, do you mean the ATR-2100x recommended as the budget option? I'm in the US and searching Google shows $80+ for the Blue Yeti and $30+ for the ATR-2100x


And I wouldn't say the build quality or stand for the ATR-2100x compares to that of a blue yeti.

We only have Yeti's at work, I love them. They look nice, they have an audio out for testing.

I personally own a Blue Snowball, I like the aesthetic a lot and it has a built-in noisecap.


Check out the Samson Q2U. Ridiculously better sounding than a Yeti, 60 bucks on Amazon US.


Samson makes great mics. I’ve had a CO1U for years and it sounds terrific.


Main value is the chat still.


For equities that is true and most Bloomberg functionality can be replicated with Sat Interactive Brokers plus some data subscriptions. Doing fixed income manually without the data pre populated in Bloomberg is very painful. But yes, the chat is where the franchise is and recent SEC actions punishing any non compliant communications like texts or alternative messaging services with massive fines have only given that moat another decade at least of invulnerability.


There are other non-Bloomberg compliant chat applications. Symphony is the big one

https://symphony.com/

but also whatsapp and imessage from company-owned devices. The fines were about chat communications from personal devices.


I think you're missing the point. it's not the chat application. it's the participants that are in the chat in Bloomberg


True


Maybe in theory. The message I get from almost everyone at a regulated institution is Bloomberg, e-mail, or voice. When the SEC is on a warpath, compliance and legal departments don’t play with anything but the clearest black and white lines to optimize for the convenience of staff. It is frustrating because it imposes a monopoly tax on financial market participants to get a Bloomberg or be shut out of information flow which is death in markets. I’ve yet to find anyone I deal with who says hey find me on Symphony.


I work at a financial institution and it's symphony for internal communications. I much prefer it to teams tbh.


What is Sat Interactive Brokers? I've used Interactive Brokers for a long time and never heard of Sat.


That is what I heard terminal was the membership fee to chat and Veblen good of office power.


Who did you hear that from?

Bloomberg provides you normalized data across all asset classes, cross asset portfolio analytics and management tools. First party trading venues, access to the world's largest broker network, immediate access to news including news sentiment indicators across the terminal offering. Access to it's own brokerage (trade book is still a thing I think), buyside and sell side Order Management platforms, APIs to feed the same stuff into your excel and servers.

Did I mention all this tooling is engineered to be compliant across regulatory regimes.

So yes chat is important and having a BB terminal definitely separates the men from the boys but that's additional to the indispensable functionality the platform itself provides.


It was a single person office that acted as a black box between traders. He had aBloomberg terminal to do it all.


How does BBG chat compare to other internet chat? Does it get as raucous?


It's not just money, it is also how you spend a limited quantity of organisational focus. You cannot do it all, this is actually even more important when you are that big of a company.


Looking at the family picture at the bottom of the page it puts the iPad Pro 11" not in a weird spot at all, just completely out of it.


The modern ones don't anymore, we have a couple of Microsoft Surfaces at the office and they're quite snappy.


But they're so expensive and small compared to a blackboard. Another commenter got a 4 foot x 6 foot blackboard, it was probably a few hundred dollars (plus the cost of chalk) and will last for decades. A 50' Microsoft Surface Hub, that's ~2 1/3 foot x ~3 1/2 foot, is ~$9,000 and will be lucky if it lasts 10 years.

There are cheaper large touchscreens but they won't use capacitive sensing which is what makes the Microsoft Surface "snappy."


Also not so good in a blackout.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: