I don't think there's any way to register for more than 10 years(?)
You still need to rely that the registrar and registry keeps operating for 10 years. For .com and common TLDs you can reasonably rely that it will keep operating forever barring some sort of general collapse of society/the internet. These newer TLDs? Maybe a bit less. Registrars like GoDaddy or Namecheap or whoever may go out of business, too.
Some registrars offer more than 10 years, but the registries don't actually allow that (afaik), so you're really just depositing money with the registrar and hoping they make it work.
I've got a (static) site that I want to live for a long time, the hosting provider does allow for deposits from others, so I'm hoping to make a large deposit with the hosting provider, but also include the necessary info to allow others to pay the bills if the deposit runs out eventually. Hopefully the company stays around.
Worst case, someone can bring it back from the internet archive and give it a new home, as I did.
They'd probably present it differently from human answers.
If people really want to be careless they can get AI generated code from copilot or chatgpt on their own already, I don't think this would be worse than that.
I've banned this account because of the Hitlerian (really?!*) URL in the profile. You can't propagate that stuff on HN. We'd ban an account for doing that in comments, and a profile is no different.
It's a pity, because you've also posted good comments and I think the proportion of good comments has been getting better over time, which is great, but that doesn't make things like the above ok.
Also, you have a history of using this site for ideological battle and we don't want that here—it's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
* Edit: on closer look, I can't tell if it might have been a bad joke instead.
Just as someone who's helped people deal with nuanced reasons why exact SQL queries optimize better or worse under various scenarios, a hundred or more times on S.O., I think the reason they turn for human advice is that they place more value in an answer to their specific question that can't be generated by AI.
Women have meaningfully been part of the workforce since at least the 70's. Both of my silent generation grandmothers worked outside of the home most of their lives.
/g/ is full of intelligent people who could easily do what I do every day at work and are still unemployed.
It's not a lack of skills. Getting a job (especially your first) is a lot of work. In some ways IMO it's more work than what you would be payed to do. Once you get payed what do you do with the money? You spend it to participate in society.
Except most of our social institutions are gone anyway. Marriage (the larger motivator) is practically symbolic at this point. All that's left are the hard economic ideas, so they can spend it to live in their own place and not deal with their mom. Even those aren't doing so well, look at home ownership or even renting. Is it worth it? Some say yes and get jobs, plenty say no.
We've restructured society so there's no place for these men even if they did find jobs, then on top of that we've brought in millions more men to ensure if that any niche that developed would be immediately filled. This is what people really mean when they complain about low wages or high inflation and it's not something that can be fixed by fiddling with the money supply.
I imagine that we would disagree mightily on quite a few things, but this I do feel is mostly accurate. I think a key and missing component of the way American society is structured is a real way for people to (for lack of a better term) upskill and make a way for themselves, with dignity, without requiring outside help. There are some who manage it, even marginalized folk, but with the caveat that they made some sort of major, risky sacrifice ("Yeah, I lived in my car why studying"), or else had access to a support network ("Thank you so much for subscribing, I'm opening commissions tomorrow!").
This is part of why things like (for example, and bear with me) the failure of single-payer healthcare was such a blow. It would have been a way to end a huge factor in why people are tied to the dysfunction of the current structure, of course, but there was also a hidden loss: so many people continue to be unable to access mental health care. With the transformation of the system in Obama's first term, might we have created a crucial nexus and resource for young people and their concerns to have met and been heard by older generations? A way, in particular, for young men to embrace guided reasoning through their desires for life in a society where traditional paths had broken down? For the people observing this unpacking of hopes and lived experience to, perhaps, find the wherewithal to parlay and make way? Maybe. Instead we got Gamergate and the toxicity of contemporary social media culture, abject failures as balms for even the ills they try to address.
Of course, this is just one link in a long chain of missteps that lead us to where we are. To expand on your statement: it's not something that can be fixed by fiddling with the money supply because it's not something that started merely with poorly-conceived monetary policy.
I like the definitions referenced in this[1] article when it comes to log, diary, and journaling. In that way, I wouldn't publish my journals to my blog.
Heh. After a couple years of normal conservatives being told their only place to go to voice complaints is 4chan you shouldn't be surprised that some of us took your advice and learned from the people there.
We don't ask students to calculate sin(1.234) by hand these days. Exams for mechanical engineering students assume they will have a calculator with SIN and EXP buttons.
It may soon be time to update the bar exam and assume law students have access to AI tools.
They have been, eg, it's a common scam to steal someone's phone and text their friends asking for money, or to hack into someone's work email and try to get a fraudulent invoice approved. I read an article about an incident of the latter once where they compromised the CEO's email, read through it enough to passably imitate his writing style, and then sent an invoice to the CFO which they described as urgent.
I've taught many people to program and can safely say python is an awful first language even for sighted users. Invisible characters being part of the syntax is awful.
Scheme IMO is the best for both sighted and blind people. There's very minimal syntax and I'd imagine a good editor with s-expression motions would make things much easier if you can't see.
Maybe I'm misremembering my youth, but isn't recursion a bit of a tough concept for a 10 year old to grasp?
Edit: I have no idea where I got 10 years old from, the post clearly doesn't list ages. In any case, I am leaving it on the offhand chance someone chimes in with a story about their kids learning scheme.
Ah yes the personal anecdotes and edge cases. Eh, I saw this coming.
The reality is that this is not an appropriate job for people with severe visual impairment that doesn't allow them to look at a screen, in very few exceptions is it the later, companies are not designed to handle this and realistically cannot.
