Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more nabogh's comments login

Why need the export import step at all? You have the workspaces already. Just include them in the scratchpad


Can we even still have multiple workspaces in scratchpad? I can't find the option anywhere


So have I lost the ability to have multiple workspaces without making an account?


To create multiple workspaces/projects, you need to create an account. When you create an account you can still work locally by:

- Enabling Git Sync which skips the cloud entirely and works with a 3rd party Git repository.

- Using Private Environments which are never synchronized in either Git or Insomnia Sync (cloud)

If you only have one collection, you can use Scratch Pad locally for that.


So you've downgraded people without an account?


Except that Git Sync has become a paid feature with this new version...


I haven't finished the series but the first book, The Way of Kings is my absolute favourite book of all time.


Does Kagi really only have 8000 members? I'm a paying customer so I figured there'd be many others paying already.


Considering search engines are on the way out, it's hardly surprising.


I don't really understand the viewpoint that people shouldn't be allowed to do math on data that I openly publish. I guess it's about protecting your livelihood.


I'm not worried about protecting my livelihood. I just don't want to contribute to training any AI.


Is your objection because of who is doing the training or just AI in general? Like do you have qualms with an individual scraping your site? And what about scraping for non-AI purposes?


I don't want to contribute to any AI models, regardless of who is making them. I don't have an issue with scraping for most other purposes, but there's no way to differentiate based on purpose.


Yea generally speaking protecting what you own from thieves is about protecting your livelihood.


What feature is available in the desktop that's not available in the cli?


x86-64 container support on Apple silicon comes to mind.


I have limited experience with podman on M1, having only pivoted recently thanks to the docker license issues but my experience so far on an M1 Mac was I couldn't initialize or start the application from the gui.

Initialize timed out due to slow proxy speeds, so I had to use "podman machine start" at the command line to wait for the image download and install to complete. For whatever reason I couldn't start using the UI after a reboot because I got an EACCESS error and again command line worked which was then acknowledged as running via the UI.

This is in an environment where the end-user has no root and podman is running in rootless mode. Once I got it running, I was able to crank up x86 http and postgres containers from the command line mostly with no issues, although pod termination seems to work better from the UI. In fact starting containers at command line throws a warning that your container architecture doesn't match your host architecture but that's it and podman just carries on after that.

When you say x86-64, is there something special about 64-bit containers that makes them only work via the UI?


I was talking about Docker not podman, as that's what I assumed the parent comment was discussing.

Docker CE does not offer an emulation layer for x86(-64) on ARM, to my knowledge.


Ah, my bad. Thought you were talking podman.


You can do that without the GUI: https://github.com/dbhi/qus


Could this not be achieved by managing your own vm on Apple silicon, if you're that averse to the Podman Desktop GUI?


It is simple on the CLI with podman using the ‘platform’ argument. They were confusingly only referring to Docker it seems.


Good idea. I might start doing this


Sounds like building something simple that aids in tracking “coverage” of reviewing ToSs could be useful to increase that the odds of spotting something untoward?

Iirc there was (is?) a site which gives a rating to the various license agreements of popular services and the like, so maybe it’s a solved problem?


I have the TOS;DR extension [1] and it gives a rating to each website's TOS and offers an explanation of the key points.

[1] https://tosdr.org/


Can't say I love Obsidian being held up as the best we can do for program design. It's closed source. It could be an elaborate system of duct tape and string holding the thing together.

I mean it likely is quite good based on their velocity and quality. But if we're to learn anything I'd really like to see its source code.


It’s okey to prefer open source over proprietary applications. But obviously we can still learn lessons about interface design from proprietary systems. We don’t need the source code in order to observe those aspects of the application.

(And if we need understand how to application operates under the hood, it’s entirely possible to use tools like IDA and Ghidra.)


Make an extensible platform through a plug-in facility is hardly new or specifically closed source solutions, doesn't it?


I haven’t made such a claim.


Then there is something I miss in the article maybe. What is the lesson there? What is indeed so special about Obsidian, a platform I'm completely unfamiliar with, that is different from any other platform with a plug-in architecture?


There's not a lot of interest around there. Deniliquin is a town of less than 8000.

This picture shows some surrounding towns https://images.theconversation.com/files/541855/original/fil...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: