1) AI can’t write or rewrite literary material, and AI-generated material will not be considered source material under the MBA, meaning that AI-generated material can’t be used to undermine a writer’s credit or separated rights.
2) A writer can choose to use AI when performing writing services, if the company consents and provided that the writer follows applicable company policies, but the company can’t require the writer to use AI software (e.g., ChatGPT) when performing writing services.
3) The Company must disclose to the writer if any materials given to the writer have been generated by AI or incorporate AI-generated material.
4) The WGA reserves the right to assert that exploitation of writers’ material to train AI is prohibited by MBA or other law.
If the writer is completely opposed to AI, they can omit its use, or if they want, they can use the way they see fit, incl. turning it up to 11.
If the writer's quality decreases because of excessive AI use, it's the writer's problem. They need to regulate their use. If the writer can use it to hone their skills, they can profit from it.
From my personal perspective, as a person who doesn't use xGPT or other models because of unethical training from my perspective, this makes sense.
Which is how Hollywood has always worked? You can’t do as much as move a light or push “Record” on a film set without being a union member.
The VFX industry has been an exception. But frankly the deteriorating working conditions, rampant outsourcing to semi-shady companies, and just the overall downwards spiral of the quality of VFX in Hollywood movies suggests that maybe it’s not a model to emulate.
I think this will have 0 effect. Writers that use AI will push some of the writers that don't use AI out of the market.
What exact scenario have they prevented?
At the extreme end, which won't happen but which would be possible under these rules, there could be a single writer who is basically just prompt engineering and reviewing what the AI spits out, for hundreds of shows.
That a studio would use AI to generate a script without the involvement of a single writer? That wasn't going to happen anyways.
So what was the point of this? Is there something I am missing?
well yeah it always is about protectionism and barrier to entry
I find it interesting tho that they are not worried about competition between writers within the association, they will have members that decide for using assisted writing and being a lot more productive than others.
The point is that they can decide for themselves if using AI would benefit them and choose to use it or not
Personally, I wonder how useful AI is going to be in terms of output over the long term. AI will endlessly regurgitate a mash up of what it was trained on in various flavors, but the output will all seem pretty samey after a while since it lacks actual originality. "This reads like something AI wrote" is something I see a lot of already. I'm sure there'll be writers who find it useful, but I don't see it being used for the bulk of their output. At least, I hope they don't just churn out scripts with AI, spend 5 minutes tweaking them, then call it day. I can't imagine that making great material.
You're making the same mistake AI people do. You can create stuff that's like what came before all day, but it won't create anything new. Literary analysis, like these plots and the more common monomyth, is about what already exists, and lags far behind. It's the same deal with music theory. People will spend years in music school learning all kinds of stuff about music, but then they have no idea how to make anything anyone wants to listen to. Music theory as taught in schools is just catching up to jazz, rock, and rap, and there's a lot of resistance.
An AI could probably do some solid analysis, like producing a beat sheet from a novel. That might be helpful. I could pants a draft, then have an AI make the outline for the second draft.
Not as a film analyst. Just as someone who has seen any of the popular movies that have been released recently. Which ones have had a plot that you walked out of in amazement and didn’t just employ the standard tropes?
My or your subjective perception of quality aren't really the topic here, are they? You swapped out the subject while you thought no one was looking.
Bringing it back to the point: the movies are popular. You can't make a popular movie from a list of plots in one book built on one guy's subjective analysis. Anyone who's tried to hew too close to any plot formula finds this out. No actual plot out in the real world with any success has a plot that looks like any other. They're unique even if you can boil it down to some list of common plot beats by tossing what makes them unique.
Doing that is fine for teaching a writing class to people who know nothing about writing yet and just need to get started. It won't produce anything good. Real plots branch and loop and evolve.
Our software helps local governments manage public outdoor spaces (parks, roads, etc.) more effectively, making it easier for good things to take place, like special events, filming and infrastructure improvements.
We’re used by cities and local governments in multiple countries and our customers love us (Net Promoter Score of 71!) We’re looking for a seasoned engineer to join our friendly and supportive team to help us continue to improve on what we have, making sure our platform can serve people well in the years to come.
We’re a small (but established) company so you won’t be a cog in a big machine here — you’ll be working directly with me (the CTO), our product manager and our other two developers to shape the platform, helping to decide what will be the most high-impact thing to work on.
Feel free to apply using the link above or reach out to me directly.
At https://apply4.com/ we have a SaaS helping local municipalities streamline how they manage particular types of permitting, including permits for filming and special events.
The sales process has typically involved multiple in-person meetings (until recently, at least) and been very long with larger contracts needing to go out to tender.
Not sure if it'll be the case for you, but we often need to persuade multiple people from the department that will be paying for the software as well as one or more people from the municipality's central IT team (who naturally have rather different concerns and priorities).
We're a successful London-based startup that is building the future of craft hobbies online. We're developing some fun, innovative models of community, commerce and content, along with great technology to underpin that.
We're looking for one or two seasoned, full-stack PHP developers to help us architect and build from the ground up a key new system for us, likely using Symfony2 or similar.
The project is for 3-6 months+, starting ASAP.
Please contact me at matt[at]broadmargins[dot]com if you'd like to learn more.
We're a successful London-based startup that is building the future of craft hobbies online. We're developing some fun, innovative models of community, commerce and content, along with great technology to underpin it.
Out stack is currently based around PHP and Magento.
We're in the process of taking on a significant new round of funding and are looking for high-calibre developers and a UX designer to join us.
George and Derek are right. In my current company, we're finding customer support to be a great way to build relationships with our customers and give them a warm and fuzzy feeling about our brand. We've seen a number of cases already where people have recommended us on Twitter directly after a positive customer support experience. It's powerful stuff.
