Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | maks25's comments login

They’re called PBNs or “private blog networks”. A bunch of low quality sites all backlinking to each other.

I don’t like the SEO industry very much.


I don’t think I have ever heard of proof of space, is it the same as proof of stake?


Completely different things.

In Proof of Stake, the network (roughly!) allocates rewards for validating transactions based on the amount of coins you have, i.e., your stake in the network.

In Proof of Space, the network allocates rewards based on you proving that you are really storing the data you were supposed to store. If you fail to produce a proof for some data item the network expected you to have stored, you lose the reward.

More info:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_stake


> In Proof of Space, the network allocates rewards based on you proving that you are really storing the data you were supposed to store.

Sort of? But you're usually not really storing data for proof of space. That's a different kind of system.


Yeah, that is called proof of storage in Filecoin:

https://spec.filecoin.io/#section-algorithms.pos


Another important wrinkle is that Chia’s proof-of-space needs you to prove you’ve stored the right cryptographic noise - rather than, for example, any useful data.


Another proof of waste shitcoin. Just what the world needed.


They are different. Chia isn't Proof of Stake because how many XCH has no impact on your odds of winning more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_stake


Sorry, dropped a couple words: "how many XCH you have has no impact"


No - it’s a bit more like preprinting big ranges of lottery tickets, that require giant look-up tables moreso than raw computation.

So it requires the dedication of some hard/rivalrous real resource, storage space, other than either strictly energy/CPU (PoW) or the protocol’s own tokens (PoStake).

See the Chia ‘Green Paper’ for more details.


Doesn’t really matter whether you do or not, it’s in Europe.


Ok 3 cities. Russia is in Europe like Turkey is. So make that 4 cities.


The vast majority of its population, 75%+, lives in Europe. Just because their current leader is worsening its ties with the West does not make Russia any less part of Europe.


My point was more when people say they're "going to Europe" they never mean they're going to Russia. If they're going to Russia they say they're going to Russia and not Europe. Russia is culturally and geographically unique.


I still don't see the reason why you would do it the wrong way, and the caption only adds to the confusion.

Why not just rewrite instead of adding a caption that doesn't make sense anyway.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: