Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lightbritefight's comments login

He has already stated he will be pulling out of the Paris accords again, so the above comment is disingenuous about current day events as well.


What they often do is put different units on the same type of good. Three chocolate bars? One will be in oz, one in lbs, one in "per unit."

They all are labelled, but it's still customer hostile to create comparison fatigue.


This is such a shame, anywhere this is mandated they should mandate by mass and for medical/vitamins per mass of active ingredient


Worse, I've seen CVS do things like place a 180-count package of generic medication next to an identically-sized 200-count package of the equivalent name brand, with the generic costing a bit less, but with a slightly higher unit price due to the mismatched quantities.


A lifetime non disparagement clause is not in any way "standard boilerplate."

That is an extraordinary clause, which is evident by the wide, stunned reaction and the CEOs rapid backpedaling as it becomes public knowledge.


Union autoworkers make more and habe better benefits than non union auto workers.

You know that when the big non unionized auto workers recebtly got raises? Right after the unionised ones fought for and got their own.

The union is the only thing that drives wages up. Non union shops, including your example of Delta flight staff, only get benefits because the unions are there. Without the other unions in that space, they would get nothing.

You know what would ensure Delta gets all the same benefits as the unionized staff around them? Joining the same union.


> Israel lets more aid through now than before the October 7th atrocities. That aid is intercepted by Hamas and does not reach the intended recipients.

No, they do not. There are still less full aid trucks even after the murder of the World kitchen volunteers massively increased international pressure on Israel to let aid in.

Northern Gaza is now in full blown famine as defined by top US officials that define famine, with southern Gaza on the brink of famine, as all farming infastructure inside gaza gas has now been destroyed. They need drastically more full trucks than the the 500/day that was the norm before the war started, not drastically fewer.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/un-aid-coordinator-says-israel...


Hamas / Gazans are bombing aid routes right now.

https://www.google.com/search?q=kerem+shalom+crossing


Truth tends to take the wind out of hypes sails.

With hundreds of billions on the line for the founders and a whole lot of likely unvested stock options for the employees, it doesnt seem like anyone wants to open up about whats actually going on day to day.


It's unclear if you are being sarcastic or not.

Apple adopted USB C on their phones because the EU compelled them to. They tend to oppose standards they aren't already using.


Bull. That’s why I put the comment in parentheses.

They had already switched their laptops to all USB-C many years ago. And iPad Pros. I think the iPad Air and iPad (no name) switched as well.

There were also strong rumblings Apple was going to release the USB-C iPhones when the rule was passed.

> They tend to oppose standards they aren't already using.

You’re kidding right? Then explain USB. Or Thunderbolt. Of every other thing I listed above. Apple didn’t invent any of them and open them. They were all existing standards.


So you're saying that's what they wanted to do all along, it just took them almost ten years, and it just happened to neatly coincide with the EU regulation as well?

Sure, and they're now allowing game streaming apps and retro emulators on iOS because that's what they always knew was best for the world anyway. What a coincidence (with the DMA, in that case)!

> Apple didn’t invent any of them and open them. They were all existing standards.

Counterpoint: Magsafe. They had USB-C and went back to something proprietary.

Another counterpoint: Thunderbolt wasn't an open standard until very recently, and I can only imagine that Intel gave Apple some heavy discounts on the controller chips used (or even their main CPUs) to push the standard.

Apple doesn't always hate standards and interoperability, but they will absolutely try to push their proprietary protocols and interfaces whenever it's in their business interest.


USB-C didn’t exist when they went to Lightning, it wasn’t an option.

The fact all their other products were moving seems to indicate they’d move to USB-C on the iPhone as well. Rumors had them working on it for years.

Now maybe it would have come out this year and not last.

MagSafe: they added something back. You can still charge with USB-C. Works fine, I do it.

Thunderbolt: that wasn’t Apple. Intel invented it and Apple put it to use. I have no idea if it’s open or closed, that’s my fault. What I meant was it wasn’t an Apple invention. Besides, what else had that kind of bandwidth at the time in a cable? It’s not like there was some common better thing they shunned.


Counter-counterpoint: When Apple introduced the Lightning connector in 2012, they described it as their connector "for the next decade".[0] Their switch from Lightning to USB-C on the iPhone came just over ten years after that announcement. Perhaps it was EU regulation, or perhaps it was Apple wanting to make good on a ten-year-old promise of connector continuity.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82dwZYw2M00&t=1571s


> Counterpoint: Magsafe. They had USB-C and went back to something proprietary.

They added MagSafe and still kept USB C charging.

> So you're saying that's what they wanted to do all along, it just took them almost ten years, and it just happened to neatly coincide with the EU regulation as well?

They had already starting to move iPads to USB C


> They had already starting to move iPads to USB C

Which they're explicitly selling as laptop alternatives, at least the Pro line.

People were already connecting all kinds of things (audio interfaces, mice, ethernet adapters etc.) to iPads using the hilariously named lignting-to-USB-host "camera adapter", and all of that is just better over USB-C.

On the iPhone, the vast majority of people only use the port for charging and maybe listening to music; the few additional iPhone sold to people that actually use them with external storage for ProRes cinematography probably pales in comparison to the lost revenue from MFI license fees.


When the camera adapter was first released, usb-c didn’t exist.

And how much do you think Apple really made on MFI licenses as a percentage of revenue? It was a rounding error and many of the knocks off people bought from Amazon weren’t even licensed.


They have both MagSafe and USB C now, and MagSafe is much better as a charging adapter anyway. Maybe a USB C MagSafe could be invented?


Excatly right. They switched to USB-C only on certain classes of devices and even then only over a incredibly long period of time when they could have moved all of their devices over to USB-C fairly quickly given their vertical integration advantages. It's interesting how my non-Apple ecosystem has me using USB-C across all devices across multiple manufacturrs but my Apple friends have multiple cables/chargers/etc to accomodate Apple's approach of using different standards across their own product lines. Thankfully EU has made this a thing of the past but if it wasn't for EU there'd be no change or it would have happened years from now.


Perhaps it was EU regulation, or perhaps it was Apple wanting to make good on a ten-year-old promise of connector continuity. When Apple introduced the Lightning connector in 2012, they described it as their iPhone connector "for the next decade".[0] Their switch from Lightning to USB-C on the iPhone came just over ten years after that.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82dwZYw2M00&t=1571s


Boy did they ever get hell when they left the 30-pin connector. I could easily see them wanting to avoid that whole mess again.

Honestly I am still blown away that the switch last year to USB-C was met with some positivity (often from tech people) and a bunch of ’meh’. I was expecting tons of screaming and “Apple’s making you buy all your cables again to juice their books!”


Freight trains can be 3 miles long. Apprently the locks are hilariously weak, and they are generally staffed by 2 people. Responding to a break in can take 30 min - hour, and the train companies dont really care because they have insurance.

It's likely that the ID on the outside of the car is vague enough to imply that there may be high value goods like detergent or alcohol inside. Once the thieves break into a car, they would generally not have time to pick another.


Pi hole will happily block IPs.

https://docs.pi-hole.net/ftldns/blockingmode/


None of those strategies block IPs. It's only a DNS server not a firewall or router.


If you have a culture in a highly regulated industry where workers can violate those regulations and you dont notice by intention or by inaction, then yes you can be held responsible.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: