Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | leeman2016's comments login

Is it just me or the latest chips from Intel look relatively better? I meant the Ultra Core 1 and 2.

Better than what they previously had: Yes, with a but. Better than the competition: Overall no.

It's because the 'core' compute part of the chip is actually made by TSMC. The surroundings are made by Intel it's own fab.

More power efficient, yes. "Better" no. They're objectively slower than the 14th gen, which is pretty pathetic for a new CPU release.

I am basically biased towards discrete GPU = asking for trouble in Linux.

Driver stability, less heat and fan noise, battery life is almost assured in the Intel iGPU.


Nah. AMD discreet GPUs are fantastic in Linux these days. You don't need to install a proprietary driver! They just work. It's really nice not having to think about the GPU's drivers or configuration at all.

The only area where AMD's discreet GPUs are lagging behind is AI stuff. You get a lot more performance with Nvidia GPUs for the same price. For gaming, though AMD is the clear winner in the price/performance space.

Of course, Nvidia is still a bit of a pain but it's of their own making. You still need to install their proprietary driver (which IMHO isn't that big a deal) but the real issue is that if you upgrade your driver from say, 550 to 555 you have to rebuild all your CUDA stuff. In theory you shouldn't have to do that but in reality I had to blow away my venv and reinstall everything in order to get torch working again.


Nvidia's GPUs work well on Linux. A friend and I use them and they are fairly problem free. In the past, when I did have some issues (mainly involving freesync), I contacted Nvidia and they fixed them. More specifically, I found that they needed to add sddm to their exclusion list, told them and they added it to the list after a few driver releases. They have also fixed documentation on request too.

Which processor? There U or the H?


Intel Core 7 Ultra 155U. 32 GB RAM. Ubuntu 22.04.


Is it the core ultra 155H? How is it efficiency/heat and performance wise?

Was planning on getting one.


Yeah, 155H + RTX 500 Ada. I use it primarily docked, so I don't really have data for efficiency/battery life. I did stress it with a Linux kernel compilation (`make -j22`), it was a while back, but I saw that the CPU frequency was up at 4GHz at the start, but dropped to 2GHz for the majority of the compilation, despite temps being in the 60-70°C range. I didn't try to troubleshoot it further since it's a work laptop and I don't compile huge projects on a regular basis. In terms of general system performance, I'm using it with Fedora KDE and it has been great.


I wonder what the combined percentage of Linux usage is for personal use. The results (distros) add up to 61% which might be overlapping (one dev using more than one distro).


Not the parent, but my experience is very good.

Right now for example, it’s at 44% after 24hrs from 100%. This is pretty sufficient for me


I loved the 12 Mini, but battery life was one of the reasons to upgrade. 44% after 24 hours is very impressive. I often wouldn't make it through the day.


there are A LOT of settings in ios that can safely be disabled while retaining "phone" functionality and conserving energy/data


In my own experience iPhones somehow just love eating through battery doing nothing. I know because I have an iPhone I hardly use. It takes around 3 days to completely drain the battery doing nothing laying on my desk. Airplane mode does extend it by a lot. Android is much better at this, probably thanks to the "doze mode".


Got a (hopefully false-positive) virus alert on Windows 11 from Defender:

> Trojan:Win32/Sabsik.FL.A!ml

> Details: This program is dangerous and executes commands from an attacker.

Maybe due to UPX?


I see it's written in Go and some antiviruses love to mark Go executables as viruses because Go bundles the whole Go runtime inside the executable, and so the antivirus' heuristics marks it as a virus, just because it shares the same Go runtime inside as some other random unrelated virus written in Go (the antivirus has no idea it's just runtime code, it just sees that the executables' machine code matches by something like ~95%)


Aren’t those platforms for the dev machine on which you would write the code and build you app?

Edit: looks like it’s for the server machine


I think the “Windows” in the title should be written with small “w”


Yes, and the first sentence of the post should have "a window" rather than "a Windows", because as is it add to the title's confusion between X windows and MS Windows.


even if this is technical article, the title is very clickbaity.


Definitely, the actual article doesn't have a capital.


You're right. 50 MB used to be big back then.

I remember my rig back in around 2002 had only 96 MB of RAM. I used to get the best out of it using Puppy and Slax distros.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: