You can have 2 automation, one which enable grayscale when certain apps are open and one that disable it when the apps are closed. It’s under shortcuts > automation > app > is closed.
I put this in a different comment but you can also have a single automation that toggles the setting for those apps on open and close. This way you have a single list of apps to maintain.
That is a terrible explanation to be honest. 10pm PT is 6am UTC, which is not a great time for Europeans. Both COTA and Miami started around noon PT, which is 8pm UTC and a much more reasonable time in Europe if you ask me.
Unless they are trying to appeal to Australian fan, my money on the real reason is that they wanted the glamour of a night race in Vegas.
As a F1 fan at the West coast, 6am or 7am are my favorite time for race events. It allows me to watch the race with a nice cup of coffee and still have a full, productive day ahead. Of most races, like in Europe, were in the middle of the day I'd stop watching again like I did when I lived in Germany. I have other stuff to do than depend 20+ weekends a year watching F1
I feel the exact same way. I miss F1 races showing at 730AM EST, it was very easy to get up and have a full day. I barely bother watching the 1PM races.
Not dmunozv04 - you need to install the 64bit version of Raspberry Pi OS (unfortunately not the default) as the project does not provide ArmV6 images with Docker. Or build your docker image/run it outside of docker.
Personally I do try to limit the amount of them I run, stick with recommended and take at least a glance at the source from time to time, but it would not defend against version updates or good efforts to obfuscate bad code.
I do feel at least somewhat confident that for recommended extensions with substantial usage the internet would surface funny business quite quickly.
But yes, I would love for some independent third party to have some review program! Unfortunately it's not clear how it would be funded.
Not only that, trustworthy extensions normally have serious well-known developers behind them which decreases the risk of stumbling into something malicious.
To this date not a single extension which has been marked as recommended by Mozilla was found to contain malware.
Google on the other hand while being 1000 times richer has none of it.
It is, and Docker for Mac uses QEMU for `--platform`, just like Podman AFAIK. The issue here is that it's QEMU user-space emulation, which does not support some syscalls, like `ioctl`.
The fix here would be to spin an amd64 VM and run the binary or install Docker there, instead of relying on the more convenient - but less compatible - user-space emulation of Docker. Not very related to this very interesting presentation on virtualizing ARM macOS guests on QEMU hosts..
Only on older setups and on the default config. Updated MacOS (13+) and updated docker provides an option to use Rosetta and the new virtualization system. That, I believe, replaces QEMU for x86 emulation with the Apple emulator.
I've had substantial success with that method; not only does it seem a bit faster, but some containerized apps that very frequently failed to start (e.g. Apache Pulsar) work consistently in that mode. I suspect this difference in experience speaks to bugs in QEMU that trigger in the presence of certain application behavior (in Pulsar's case, something weird happening with the JVM on startup).
QEMU's still an incredible feat of engineering and something I frequently use on Linux, though. It just seems that the Apple emulation on Macs is better (which makes sense, given that it's built by the people who made the semi-proprietary silicon it's emulating from).
Can I ask a question? It seems like your post is combining two separate things. As I understand it and based on earlier comments in the thread:
1. To run a Linux container you need to be running Linux
2. This is why Docker for Max has always run a VM under the covers. It uses qemu.
3. This was true even before Apple Silicon when everything was x86_64 and nothing was emulated
Now you are bringing up Rosetta and x86 emulation. While I understand sometimes it’s necessary to run a container that hasn’t been compiled for aarch64 (or whatever they call Apple) so I can see why the actual cpu emulation capabilities of qemu or Rosetta would be necessary there, this seems to be beside the point.
if you have no Linux system involved because you have no VM, how would that work? What would the base system “under” the container be and what would respond to Linux’s OS-level calls?
> sometimes it’s necessary to run a container that hasn’t been compiled for aarch64
I have several containers in that boat, for which no ARM versions exist at all. Those containers were previously using QEMU to emulate x86 on ARM linux (in Docker's VM on an ARM Mac). That emulation encountered the failures I described, and was slow.
Something I don't know and am curious about is how Docker-for-Mac is actually using Rosetta 2. Is it running an additional Linux VM containing an x86 Linux OS, and running that VM through a Rosetta-2-enabled hypervisor? Or is Rosetta 2 distributed as a Linux program that is being invoked inside Docker's pre-existing aarch64 Linux VM instead of (or inside of?) QEMU?
Edit: as for your question:
> if you have no Linux system involved because you have no VM, how would that work?
Yes, Rosetta 2 is being used by Docker’s pre-existing aarch64 Linux VM. So it’s only translating userspace x86 code to Arm, then running it on the ARM Linux VM. Syscalls, etc. are still handled by the (aarch64) Linux VM.
The Zenfone is the same size as a regular iPhone. I know reviewers hype it up as a small phone and in the android context, it is - but it's not comparable to the iPhone mini.
I still have to see a single webapp that is as performant and feels the same as a native one. We might get there, and lots of companies are happy to release a half-backed webapp today, but that is definitely not the experience today.
I could post a mini saas that I made in php and mysql, using jQuery on the front end, that outperforms just about any webapp and most modern local apps, but I don't want to attract too much attention because I'm sure technically it's easily breakable to pros and malicious people.
Also, it runs on a $4 a month namecheap server.
Why is so fast? Because I came from the land of slow crms, and performance was my #1 goal. Instead of making it faster to develope, I made it faster for the end user.
Is that a worthwhile business goal? I don't know. But I know it's fast.
Render speed of browser engines is really good these days on mobile phones. Getting fluid animations is maybe even easier and faster with css than with the Android sdk or ios. Plenty of frameworks out there to create nice SPAs.
Some parts still have to be native like Auth, billing etc. But majority of the app can be web.
Both of them still exists, but of course in some situations it doesn't make sense, so there is a lot of leeway depending on the reviewers. My experience is positive here, I can't remember the last time an app did not allow me to not have an account or manually provide data when it made sense.
(iv) Access [...] Where possible, provide alternative solutions for users who don’t grant consent. For example, if a user declines to share Location, offer the ability to manually enter an address.
(v) Account Sign-In: If your app doesn’t include significant account-based features, let people use it without a login [...]
Thanks for doing the work by digging up and linking to the actual guidelines! That's pretty close to how the wording was all those years ago. Like all things AppStore, the enforcement is what ends up being uneven and subject to Apple's discretion and judgment. Which is a good thing IMO. Without publisher discretion, you just get scummy developers who rules-lawyer their way onto the app store.
Just different. I hate hangovers but love a good buzz. Unfortunately, alcohol is quite addictive to me. While I never got to the level I would define myself and alcoholic (I have definitely tip-toed that line in my life) just going out for one pint or having one beer is almost impossible - once I start drinking, all common sense goes out of the window and I keep going. A normal night to the pub might end up easily at 5 or 8 pints. At least it doesn't really alter my character :)
It's interesting because I don't tend to get addicted to things. I've never tried hard drugs, but I can quit coffee cold-turkey (and have done, several times. Just because I was feeling like switching to tea or oat milk in the morning) and never really got into weed.
(anyway, stopped drinking a couple months ago. Alcohol free beer is great for that to be honest. I do miss a nice whiskey from time to time. Let's see if I keep it up)
