Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kevinyew's comments login

Maybe it you're running Windows XP, but that is absolutely not true for a supported version of Windows. It is absolute FUD to say simply connecting a Windows 10/11 machine to the internet will cause it to be automatically infected.


This doesn't make any sense, this vulnerability is in the context of browsers, not server side runtimes.


Love this reference, that MattKC video is so good.

For the uninitiated, I present this masterpiece: https://youtu.be/CTUMNtKQLl8


I didn't know Typeform offered payment processing, huh.


It's in the paid plan


Been enjoying playing a couple games of Seven Wonders Duel so far, but one immediate issue is that there is no way to unsubscribe from the emails telling me it's my turn. I've already got browser notifications turned on, so these emails are filling up my inbox fast.

I've also reported a couple bugs so far, the main one being not being able to build Wonders even though I have adequate resources, but other than that, amazing work! I'm keen to implement a game myself sometime soon.


Oh darn, sorry about the email notifications. I'm going to disable them and give them a little extra polish later. Thanks for letting me know


WAN show reference?


Yep :)


There is nothing about HTML/CSS/JS that prevents simplicity. It is purely how it has been used and abused. You can also disable JS and use user agent stylesheets in any modern web browser.


> There is nothing about HTML/CSS/JS that prevents simplicity

You're right, there isn't yet here we are. Where I need to download and run a React program every time I want to read an article.


It would be great if React could be built directly into browsers, but it would greatly curtail the current flexibility of server-vended React. The project is able to evolve quite quickly unshackled from a w3c process and the pulse of major browser updates.

(IIUC, there was a proposal in Firefox decades ago to make the engine into several flexible modules and a page could declare which modules it depended upon, then the browser would either cache them and use them for multiple sites or already have them builtin. You'd get the best of both worlds: rich and expressive pages without the frequently-paid cost of poly-filling the gap between how the developer wants the render engine to work and the actual implementation of the render engine.

Sadly, I suspect the actual complexity to implement would have made for a worse overall situation than what we have now).


I haven't done any professional web stuff in a few years, wasn't this kind of the idea of web components? As you said, The React team can move a lot faster than w3c and each browser vendor.


Where is the button to enable JavaScript? For reasons of simplicity, resource use, and security JavaScript should be disabled by default. But there ain't that button, it's complicated.

Where is the security? Chrome last I checked had eight actively exploited zero-days last year, which is laughably bad compared to the other operating system I use. Perhaps if the modern web was simpler, a browser would be easier to implement, and more time could be spent on making it not a raging security dumpster fire? But it ain't, it's complicated.

How does one even setup user agent stylesheets? What could that be but yet more complexity? Meanwhile, I'll use w3m and amfora and if it's a broken page that mandates Flash, JavaScript, whatever, I most likely won't bother launching a "heavyweight champion" browser. The CPU fans will last longer that way.


You can read a book on your tablet / laptop, or even watch a movie adaptation; or you can read a book on dead trees. Some people would like to recreate certain aspects of the "dead tree" experience without actually killing trees.


use a dedicated ebook reader.


So isn't this kind of project very similar in scope to an ebook reader app? It just focuses on browsing hypertext media, rather than a pdf/epub.

I still don't understand why it's utility is being questioned, when the entire category clearly has a user base.


While it doesn't prevent simplicity, it allows and enables distracting complexity. Also a lot of sites just break if you disable js.


Sadly, boardgame arena also pushes advertising for new games and features through the notifications as well. I'm sure it's possible to disable specific categories, but it unfortunately undermines their value even more when otherwise legitimate sites still somewhat abuse push notifications.


They're already picking a fight with Cellebrite simply by existing, as Signal is antithetical to everything that Cellebrite stands for.


buying a safe != killing the guy thats invading your house


I think this would be more like including exploding dye packs in your bags of money.


I wish there was something like this for JAMstack/JS only websites that you host on eg Netlify. I know Netlify has their own analytics but they're paid, which is fair enough, but hard to bite the bullet when Google Analytics is free.


I believe Cloudflare’s analytics are free. I use it because they don’t set cookies and don’t share the collected data with anyone.


I'm using netlify by building directly from github. How would I go about inserting cloudflare into this?


I think you can sign up for a Cloudflare account and add the JS snippet they mention to your site. It’ll look like

<script defer src='https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js' data-cf-beacon='{"token": "$SITE_TOKEN"}'></script>


Ahhh okay thanks thought it had to be done by using cf as a cdn or something.


Totally understandable that you would think that. Cloudflare also provides server analytics if you use them as a CDN. That doesn't work for single page apps which don't necessarily make server requests when the URL changes, so they introduced a new product ("Web Analytics") to handle this.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: