Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jsalit's comments login

and what if you weren't so mobile?


I don't feel like this article does a good job making its case. Java won't live or die with Oracle. Along with the language spec and non-Oracle implementations being available, there are other (arguably more influential) companies still putting huge amounts of money behind Java tech; e.g., Google and IBM.


The specs say the Maximum Operating Altitude is "-300m to +4877m".


Where? I'm getting it from http://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-band/en-us/support/hardwa... and it says Maximum operating altitude: +1200 m (3937 feet)


Your link appears to be the specifications for the old band - there's no barometer listed in the sensors, and there are dual batteries listed (I believe the new one only has one).

I wish there were a better distinction between the two; this should be called the Band 2, not the "new Band." This is made worse by the fact that your link is reachable by clicking "Support" -> "Hardware" -> "Microsoft Band Specifications." Nothing in that path suggests anything about the old Band.

The specs for the new Band are at https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-band/en-us/features - you have to click on "tech specs." This supports the -300 to +4877 meters number.


What exactly are "paper-thin evaporative materials"?


This is awesome! Made me think of this Del song [1]. And I agree with others, that logo is fantastic :D

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0xDGXotGIE


ha! I hadn't heard that one before. Maybe I can get the rights for the next video. Thanks for the feedback!


Small correction, it's based on your highest 35 years of salary[1]

[1] - http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10070.pdf


Right, thank you. I only have 2 more years to go.


Congrats!


There's no such thing as doping without influencing others; the indirect influences alone affect the economics of the sport.


Exactly, you shift the goalpost for attainable performance and the minimal performance necessary to be professional. A good example of this is e-sports, where it's well known, especially among FPS players that people competing are using stimulants -- and this has been the status quo for more than a decade. Which might be neutral, if things like steroids/stimulants weren't so terrible for you, but they have noticable consequences for your health.


Also presented here by John Green - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snQvRZ2vDHE


IBM still uses Notes for email, and a lot of legacy database-like applications. There's Notes-based webmail, but it's still Notes.


The new Notes-based webmail is Verse. It's not horrible. It's not great. It's just bad in different ways than Notes was.


Actually there are two. A web based notes, and the new 'verse'.


You're assuming most people search first; many users don't even understand the difference between entering a search term versus a URL in a browser address bar. Yet, non-techy people know ".com".


I dont have the data but I would argue such minority is very less and even if they are unable to find what they are looking for in first attempt (by using .com), they do check search engines result afterwards.


I think it is the opposite. Among most of the "non tech" people I know, they enter a name at a google search box rather than a URL. Even if they know the URL, they enter it at a search field!


Correct. I have seen this with my own eyes. Me: Go to Facebook. Them: Google, Search Box, Enter Facebook.com in search box, Click.


Actually many non-techy do this:

1) Open browser, 2) Defaults to whatever search engine that add-on they have switch them to, 3) Type facebook, or facebook.com, or whatever they are looking for, 4) Click first result. If fails, go back, look around, click other result.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: