Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johnfarrelldev's comments login

It's not closing down, from the article they are moving to newer furnace technology which requires less workers to run.


Correct. There are two major steel producers still operating in the UK: British Steel's Scunthorpe steelworks in the North East of England, and Tata Steel's Port Talbot steelworks in South Wales.

Both have announced plans to convert from blast furnaces to modern electric arc furnaces. This will greatly reduce emissions - they are among the largest industrial polluters in the UK (along with the Drax wood-burning power station). But conversion to arc furnaces also means that fewer workers will be required.


As I understand it, Britain will no longer be able to produce steel from iron ore, only from scrap. Which doesn’t sound good strategically.


It actually makes sense strategically. Britain already has more steel than it will likely ever need, in fact it's one of the world's major exporters of scrap metals. But it depends on imports for iron ore. Why import iron ore (and coking coal, for that matter) when the resource you need to make better, more valuable steels more efficiently is already here?


Because it's questionable whether that's even possible.


Of course it is possible! Around 25% of the world's steel is already produced by electric arc furnaces. 100% in some countries, and over 70% in the USA.

The UK exports 7-8 million tonnes of scrap steel every year, while producing about 5 million tonnes in blast furnaces. There's more than enough feedstock to replace all the UK blast furnace steel production with EAFs and still have some left over.


Does that apply in the case of war, which was intended by ‘strategic’? I’m reminded of Australia’s supply of iron to Japan before WWII. Which earned future prime minister Robert Menzies the nickname ‘Pig Iron Bob’.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_Dalfram_dispute


In the case of war we'd need to import iron ore anyway so, with this we can import scrap steel.


This is self reported data which tends to be really bad data for obese patients.

https://sci-hub.wf/10.1056/NEJM199305203282014


I haven't completed or deployed it yet but I wrote a C# API to calculate your chance of winning a hand of poker based on all known cards at the table.

All unknown cards are randomly assigned and it just loops a bunch, reasonably easy to implement and actually is reasonably fast.

https://github.com/JohnFarrellDev/PokerMonteCarloAPI/

With the amount of possible outcomes Bayesian statistics just didn't seem reasonable to implement.

Goes without saying this tool is still fairly basic, it shouldn't be used to inform how much to bet or when to fold as it doesn't take into account information such as how much your opponents are betting.


I wrote a Haskell version that includes two components:

A very efficient function to rank a set of Texas Hold’em hands.

A Monte Carlo situation that gives you the probability of winning each hand from any known amount of information.

It is available here: https://github.com/ghais/poker


Not sure if you guys are aware but there are solvers existing (most of which are proprietary) that actually give optimal strategies with every possible hands given a betting pattern. They are used extensively as study tools by professional players.


Can you link to some projects? Ideally also Haskell or also functional?


I use GTO+ which is proprietary.

I just tried this one which works like a charm (just run the exe from the zip in github releases ; even comes pre-loaded with a wide amount of preflop ranges, which seem to come from a previous solve) : https://github.com/bupticybee/TexasSolver

Searching with "poker solver haskell" only seem to show very immature projects.


I always found the funniest occurrence of this was in the Civ game though it seems it originally being a bug is disputed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Gandhi


The bug never existed at all in Civ 1. It was an urban legend all along. Similar behavior was intentional in Civ 5 as a joke, which convinced everyone that it really did happen in Civ 1 when it never did.



Mandela effect


It's the result of people repeating what they read on the Internet, not what they personally experienced.

This happens way too often


> This happens way too often

You're not wrong; but fyi it only happens in your originating universe. Over here we all experienced it.


People being lied to is not the Mandela effect. The Mandela effect is about things you personally remember.

A Mandela effect here would be if the explanations themselves that talked about overflow never existed.


Wraps absolutely are a short cut in that every lifter can instantly lift more wearing them due to the elastic tension they're able to provide.

I don't think there is much evidence suggesting training squats wrapped would then result in the unwrapped squat being stronger for an elite lifter. I'd actually be concerned that the technical changes and also the different strength curve for a wrapped squat might throw off someone's regular squat.


A wrapped squat is still a squat. Do heavy knee wraps allow you to squat more? Absolutely. But other than the weight being higher, you squat basically the same with or without wraps. So training in wraps will absolutely help your raw squat -- it isn't like the wraps take away all muscle stimulus from the squat.

That being said, I think most lifters hold off on doing wraps until close to a competition or when hitting near max. Wraps are painful and take a lot of work to put on if doing them tight, so it isn't something you do on every squat. Also, I think people over-estimate how much extra weight one can lift with wraps versus without. It varies from one lifter to the next, but I think the average might be around 10%.

Source -- powerlifter of 10+ years who trains both regular and wrapped squats all the time.


All else being equal it's still potentially meaningful stimulus. There's no way it doesn't translate if you're training wrapped in a way that would stimulates hypertrophy or strength increase - it's an offset upwards, sure, but the muscles will still respond to the work.


I'm not sure about other engines but V8 the most popular JS engine does not implement tail calls.


If you're into maxes and coding you should check out: http://www.mazesforprogrammers.com/


Also the blog from the book author, with visualizations and separate blog posts for several different maze generation algorithms: http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2011/2/7/maze-generation-algorit...


It's not the case for all consultancies though. The company I work for (much smaller than Accenture) does solely government contracting work and the majority of that code is open source. Every project I have personally been involved with for example has been open source.


> The Schwarz Group covers the entire value chain of the food trade like no other trading company, from production to sales to materials management. Digitalization and its pressure to change are noticeable in all business areas. To continue to successfully serve rising customer needs, new digital business models must be iterated even faster – and this while the data and system infrastructure becomes increasingly complex. As the number 1 in the European retail business, the Schwarz Group knows that those who do not digitize will lose market share in the long term.

Lidl are part of the Schwarz Group.


You can sign your commits with a GPG key, in your GitHub settings you can then link a GPG key to your account.

You can then make it that GitHub shows any non signed commit as unverified and at a project level not allow PRs that contain unsigned commits.


> you can then link a GPG key to your account

I think you can only link a GPG public key though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: