Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more int0x29's comments login

I'll need 7 5 gigawatt datacenters in the middle of major urban areas or we might lose the Bubble Sort race with the Chinese.


Surely you'll be able to reduce this by getting TSMC to build new fabs to construct your new Bubble Sort Processors (BSPs).


I'll give you US$7Tn in investment. Just don't ask where it's coming from.


Surely a 1.21-GW datacenter would suffice!


Have we decided when are we deprecating it? I'm already cultivating another team in a remote location to work on a competing product that we will include into Google Cloud a month before deprecating this one.


Isn't this what a surge protector is for?


Nothing is really going to protect you from a direct lightning strike. Lightning strikes are on the order of millions of volts and thousands of amps. It will arc between circuits that are close enough and it will raise the ground voltage by thousands of volts too. You basically need a lighting rod buried deep into the earth to prevent it hitting your house directly and then you’re still probably going to deal with fried electronics (but your house will survive). Surge protectors are for faulty power supplies and much milder transient events on the grid and maybe a lightning strike a mile or so away.


Would a UPS protect against that either, though?


No. Current will find a way. Lightning will destroy things you didn’t even think would be possible to destroy.


So I'm still left with int0x29's original question: "Isn't this [an electricity spike that a UPS could protect against] what a surge protector is for?"


Yes. In most cases, assuming you live in a 220V country, a surge protector will absorb the upwards spike, and the voltage range (a universal PSU can go as low as 107V) will handle the brownout voltage dip.


Pretty sure surge protectors are less effective against dips than they are spikes


I addition to the incentive to hide it and not stir up any obvious evidence, anyone with enough money to throw at the problem probably doesn't want to wreck the current financial system


That screenshot shows 31 gb of ram which is distinctly more than the mentioned dev board at max specs. Are they using something else here?


Pioneer, an older board.

Note that, today, one of the recent options with several, faster cores implementing RVA22 and RVV 1.0 is the better idea.



The milk-v pioneer comes with 128GB of RAM.


Firefox isn't really making enough in donations to maintain a major piece of web infrastructure. So it gets search revenue from Google, which people complain about (and may not be long term sustainable). So they go make other paid for things looking for revenue, which people complain about.



The complaint is about manhours.

Maybe the search money dont pay the bills but they definitely squandered their improvements


If the user donations aren’t enough, surely their main revenue source—the 100s of millions of dollars they get from Google—is? Or do they need billions just to maintain a competent browser?


If there was ever a case to link to a text only version a discussion of architecture isn't it. The full article with images: https://www.npr.org/2024/08/12/g-s1-6417/brutalism-architect...


Thank you! I was so confused, reading the article and scratching my head wondering why there were no pictures. In the end I started doing image searches to see what the buildings looked like for myself.


It would also help to have such a description in the README


It's interesting watching silicon valley buzzwords mix with DOD speak.


Might want a strobe warning. At least for Firefox and Chromium in Linux on a desktop it strobes heavily in the starting state.


It depends on the display type. When run on something with low per pixel lighting it can flicker a bit due to how quickly the average light changes frame to frame. Anything with local dim zones may struggle. I looked at ways to fix this but could not come up anything other than running a blur filter which ends up looking terrible.


"When run on something with low per pixel lighting it can flicker a bit due to how quickly the average light changes frame to frame"

Not sure I understand. The flicker is not due to sometimes the screen drawn with white(like I assumed) and just because of my mobiles light settings?

Other simulations similar to this, don't have this flicker on my devive.

(still impressive work, genuine question to avoid this effect in my experiements)

And no matter the technical reasons, for some people this might be a serious health issue, so a warming might make sense in the current state.


Not sure how regenerative braking works if it doesn't disengage the accelerator when the brakes are pressed. Yes in this case the brakepads would be used, but I'd also expect the motor to be off.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: