Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | illuminant's comments login

The quantum process IS consciousness. Life animates and extends this as a technology.


Consciousness, the inflection upon the potential of existential being (a feedback loop) or awake awareness? Seems kind of obvious to me, so that the Universe can peer back upon and interact with itself.

Apparently, modern popular "science based" thinking finds the possibility unfashionable that all existential reality is dormant consciousness which life subjectively scopes and makes animate


Tbh, unless it's well known you don't have to bring it up. Focus on your role. One of my most exciting and most engaging opportunities went under (small multinational company), I often talk of my experiences and contributions, yet no one ever asked what happened to the company.

No one blames devs for the fate of orgs or their projects.


> unless it's well known you don't have to bring it up.

Oh, good point. I don't think that I've ever mentioned (or even been asked about) the fate of any particular project I've put on my resume.


We do, it's called "the military" and it does not preach violence for just any reason, it is the final recourse.

Peace is not possible without the capacity for war. If you say otherwise, you deceive yourself and you have learned nothing from the history of humanity.


I am not a product of academia (though I have spent decades in self studies.)

I think of intelligence all the time. In fact, I am pushing the definition, intelligence: the mitigation of uncertainty. If it does not mitigate uncertainty, it is not intelligent.

I have to say, I barely ever compare myself with others.

There are many forms of intelligence, and I do criticize the poor language comprehension skills of ordinary people (I say there is wide spread "illiteracy", as there is a casm between capacity to read and reading capacity.

However, even the most modest person may harbor a surprising insight, experience, or intellectual gem.

Yes, focus upon tasks at hand, and don't be arrogant, for however intelligent Man is born a fool, lives his entire life a fool, and dies a fool. It is only his determination to be otherwise in between which may make it so.


I disagree with the quote and the general conception of intelligence.

The scalar nature of intelligence is more like points on a sphere than a hockey stick graph of good answers. How much area/depth of a sphere can an intelligence cover without becoming vulnerable to expectations or predisposition? All of it? I think impractical. Everything dies, everything falls apart, everything has points of failure. Even intelligence, super or not.

Intelligence (the mitigation of uncertainty) is highly dependent upon information (the removal/reduction of uncertainty), which is dependent upon context and disposition. "Why?" (And "who cares?") for instance.

Sure there is raw computing power, and some linear correlations, however life systems optimize iteratively such that precision and capacity structurally change.

A wolf's hunting strategy vs a scientist's for instance. Who is "more intelligent?" I'm sure you'll say we can hunt wolves though I would counter, mostly by superior technology, not necessarily by intelligence.

Super intelligence can be super naive (different problem domains specialize.)

Super intelligence wouldn't have the same needs as Man. Sure such could zoom off into the cosmos, though who cares? We can take our own trip in due time. Solving problems for others is no great service as self reliance is a blessing more than a curse.

Imagining a gradient where Man cannot peer merely by finite scalar capacity is not an accurate depiction of this domain.


> he continued to suffer from severe psychotic symptoms, including auditory hallucinations and religious delusions.

We are not alone in our own minds and the disembodied voices are messing with us. Just last week the nypost featured an article of a mother who murdered her own children claiming God told her to do so.

"Science based thinking" does not mean denying truth by incredulity. Hypocrites.


Beautiful dream, though reality is yet to be tested. The greatest challenge I foresee is that effective food systems require a great deal of processing. Without an army of regular maintainers the ambition may fall to rot, pests, and inconsistent availability (unreliable.)

I myself have had this dream, and have exhausted myself on small scale projects facing similar challenges.


We are not alone in alone in our own minds. There is a secret culture, a secret governance, and a secret war upon us all. This has always been among us (one in six of us know exactly what I'm talking about, however you will be punished for speaking of this greatest taboo.) These "thought control" us, in a meddlesome immoral and lawless ways, and are responsible for much of the insanity plaguing our world.


I was thinking the same thing about my uConsole.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: