Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ido's comments login

While the US is extrem, the “obesity epidemic” affects pretty much all countries as they become richer. I wonder if recent developments in obesity drugs like ozempic will have a significant impact there in the coming decades.

These obesity drugs are already having a huge effect -- obesity is down in the US for the first time in a long time (2023).

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullartic...


I'm only 41 but that's long enough to have also seen this happen a few times (got my first job as a professional developer at age 18). I've also dabbled in using copilot and chatgpt and I find at most they're a boost to an experienced developer- they're not enough to make a novice a replacement for a senior.

I think the concern is that they might become good enough for a senior to not need a novice. At that point where to the seniors come from?

We’re here already. Nobody wants to hire junior devs anymore. Seniors are still a couple phone calls away from new positions.

I got my first job in 2001, it was like that then as well (maybe even worse). It got better when the market picked up again. I’m confident there still won’t be “enough developers” when then happens just like there’s never “enough electricity” despite the fact the power grid keep getting expanded all the time - people fine a use for even more.

If developers become more productive (both juniors and seniors), there will be more demand for all of them.

Or few will be productive enough to cover everything. Compare amount of bobcat operators vs ditch diggers.

When the market heats up again companies will bite the bullet and hire juniors when they can’t get enough seniors.

That "need" is not as a helper but a cheap way to train the next gen senior which by the time they are senior know the ins and outs of your company's tech so well that they will be hard to replace by an external hire.

If your approach to juniors is that they are just cheap labour monkeys designed to churn out braindead crap and boost the ego of your seniors then you have a management problem and I'm glad I'm working somewhere else.


You sure it wasn’t a DX? The SX only came out in ‘88.

Either way, that would be a hell of a high end system for that time.


I think you just showed lack of knowledge on Clipper product names.

Before 5, they had season names, I didn't mention to be using Clipper Summer '87 in 1987, rather having used it.


Sorry, I misunderstood then!

In the early 90s (maybe '92 or '93) my elementary school had a program where we'd go to the computer room and email kids in another school. There was nothing else to do on those computers that involved the internet (no web browsers), these were (relatively) state of the art 386s running DOS.

Anyway I remember we used to write our weekly emails on paper first and then type them into the computer- your quote reminded me of that!


That doesn't sound that malignant?

I don’t know where you were born and how old you are, but that situation was defiantly not usual when i was a child (born 1983 in Israel). If anything I think I’d need a startup-liquidity-event level windfall to be able to afford housing as spacious as my parents bought in the 80s (housing costs increased way more than wages).

It may have been when my parents were born though (mid 1940s, one in what is now Israel and the other in what was then the Soviet Union).


But your parents didn't live in Israel 2019. Israel 1983 was more like today's Venezuela or Argentina. If you move today to a place comparable to Israel in 1983, you'll be able to afford even more space than your parents.

Not sure why 2019 specifically, it's 2024. I think you also underestimate 1980s Israel - although there was a stock-market crash in 1983, it was not otherwise that poor- maybe more like today's Portugal or Greece than Venezuela.

But anyway my parents were 1983 Israelis, they didn't come with future-Israel purchasing power - so they were able to afford their housing on the income of the time :) Other kids in my class had ± similar housing. Some were poor and had worse housing, but not 5 people in a 62m flat level of poverty- for that to be common you had to go back another couple decades (e.g. my mother's childhood experience in the 40s-50s was more like that, might have been common up to the 60s).


> Not sure why 2019 specifically, it's 2024.

Because in 2019 real estate was not only expensive by itself, but also all the future growth was added to a price.

Today in 2024 you can buy very cheap in some places (north, for example).

> there was a stock-market crash in 1983

Not just stock-market. By the time of the crash, Likud laid waste to the whole economy to undermine "the left".


I don’t see where you get that definition. If you’re the one running the company, you’re the CEO.

You may argue you need employees to be a CEO rather than a consultant but you certainly don’t need a board of directors.


On the demand side - but how would automation/AI/robotics impact the supply/production side (i.e. will we replace the unborn would-be new workers with new robots)?


They would impact it by siphoning greater proportions of economic surplus to the owners of said robots, i.e. the wealthy.


Fortunately, there is no limit to what we want :-)

According to my high-school econ teacher, who defined economics as the art of satisfying our unlimited desires with limited resources.


Rest assured the Amiga crashed plenty too.


Yeah, but the whole machine needing to be rebooted?


Yes.

The basic problem with those old home computer operating systems was the lack of memory protection. Any program could overwrite the memory of any other program, or even vital components of the operating system.

While memory protection was touted as a huge improvement for end users, its actual benefit was to developers. Just try to debugging memory issues in the application's own address space. Now try to imagine doing the same, where your only hints of a problem is someone else's code crashing because of memory you inadvertently overwrote.


Yes. It had an ugly UI and preemptive multitasking, but it didn't have memory protection and -- unlike MultiFinder -- didn't clean up after apps for certain resources, so you'd eventually need to reboot to get those resources back even if your system remained stable.


The UI in Amiga OS 2.0 was a huge improvement... It felt like night and day! Earlier versions were definitely pretty bad looking.


They were.

Of course, we still loved them. And the nostalgia, now.


Yes. I still dream of an alternate universe where Commodore survived. Perhaps we'd all be using Amiga Unix instead of MacOS.


I remember there being "recoverable" errors in later versions of the OS. But if you got a "Guru Meditation" you were almost always done. With newer machines (68020+ w/MMU) you could protect the first page of memory which helped ("Enforcer" was the name of the program, I think.)


Often times auto-rebooting and showing a guru meditation.

AmigaOS 1.0 was a disaster, 1.1 much better, 1.2 and 1.3 seldom if ever crashed.

2.0+ changed a lot... would be AmigaOS's own "system 7".


It been a couple years since I was testing, but as a game developer I can tell you the performance difference is significant (altho I wonder if it’s due to driver quality or middleware being less optimised for android hardware).

I believe it was around 2021-22 when I was thoroughly testing but at the time even a 5 year old iPhone was faster than a brand new mid-range android (one of the Chinese brands that had good specs on paper).

And by faster I mean an integer multiple higher FPS, not just a little faster.

My guess would be that popular software like Unity and Unreal is much better optimised for iOS GPUs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: