Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | help_everyone's comments login

I suppose the leadership team at Uber would be the outlier (at least the media would have us believe)? But then again, perhaps most of them aren't "founders" but hired guns.


Finally! There has been talk for what seems months for an upgrade path. I'm so happy that there is finally some clarification.


I've had the opposite experience, with a code base responsible for millions in revenue each month.

Took less than a day to understand angular from nothing -- taking more than a day just to evaluate flux implementations with react.


Not sure how I feel about cleaning up a code base as doing "fake work".


It does not lead to the growth of a company directly. Better to work on more features than to work on cleaning up the desk.


I agree and disagree with this point. The absolute worse thing a startup can do is to "flip"/"redo" their code base, in an attempt to clean it up. We learned that the hard way last year. That said, going through code and occasionally cleaning a class or two in order to achieve a desired feature can save time while debugging, usually a lot.

This is like most things in life, taken in moderation = good for you, but the extreme might kill you (or in this case, your startup).


Sales.


You mean they are simply being sold to so well they don't conduct their own research? That also seems like an unsatisfactory explanation.


I would say so. My understanding is most of finance is more about who you know than anything else. This understanding comes from my work in the legal industry and having high-powered and incredibly wealthy clients. The product we were selling (legal services) wasn't any better than what was down the street but because of personal connections we got the business and it seemed that way for most of the deals that revolved around their (wealthy people's) decisions.

I specifically dealt with legalities of financial matters of the very wealthy.

edit... I'd like to add that the majority of my clients didn't have the time or the willingness to do their own research on the vast majority of their personal finances. Instead they would use people they trust at specific institutions and give little thought after that.


Its hard for me be believe that people with a lot of money whose only job in life is to figure out how not to lose it do not do their research. There has to be deeper reason.


I've pondered this too.

I have a friend who is a successful business person and know some others - none in the finance industry.

These are just observations from a tiny sample size. First I am surprised that none understand the finance industry; understandable since they were too buzy building a business to worry about anything but cashflow. More importantly is that I think they all suffer from a cogitative bias - they all ignore survivorship bias and believe they can beat the "system" which makes them susceptible to slick finance sales pitches. That sounds a bit cruel - i don't mean it to be; the same attitude got them to where they are.


No; the institutional investors (pensions, endowments, trusts, etc) who are largely the ones buying these hedge funds are just as much a part of the game as the hedge funds themselves.


Yes. Cheaper index-funds are often the better choice, but banks aren't selling those as agressively.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: