Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more heax's comments login

Hmmm, great idea that way cloud providers can extract insane amounts of money from unsuspecting organizations. Let's call it function as a service :)


Wake me up when they develop their No-/Low-code tool in their tool itself. Up to that point it is not better than code itself :)


::alarm alarm::

Unqork uses Unqork to deliver most all of it's SDLC capabilities because yes, as some folks stated to start this: no-code is still creating software and you need visibility, governance, etc around it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkXPakTWAEQ


They do declare projects dead. They even have a place for them https://attic.apache.org/


For cyclists and motorcycles they create additional road hazards by adding paint that gets as slippery as ice when wet. Thanks for nothing.


The paint they use on the streets has equivalent or better traction than the asphalt. That's why there hasn't been a huge increase in cyclists falling over when the bike lanes get totally filled in with paint (e.g. the first one here: https://www.losgatosca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/20028/Green-b...)


You're assuming that these will use the same paint that legitimate crosswalks do.


Yes, but considering that's what their own guide says to do I think that's a fairly safe assumption.


Paint that doesn't get slippery exists. Here, bike lanes are painted red (not the border of the lanes, but the lane itself) and it works just fine. If your city uses bad paint you might be able to convince them to change it.


I know it exists and it is used here everywhere. But those from the article are just using some latex paint, creating road hazards in their self righteous cause.


They specifically mention “traffic marking latex paint suitable for asphalt”.



The proles should try eating cake if they are out of bread :)


Not a problem with my oven which starts at 30C (86F) in 5 deg steps.

I guess they are using some cheaper components that are specified only for a temperature range above 200F.


Same for mine (Neff), I often use it for proving dough.


Damn, 30C? That's perfect!

What brand of oven do you own?


My new AEG goes all the way to 20C. In single step. Great for fermentation of sourdough i.e.!


It is a rather new (last year) Miele model.


That is how I understood it also.

The new part of their discovery is that visiting a malicious website can run the attack on servers in the private network via a JavaScript application and websockets.

That means even applications which are not exposed to the internet can be attacked.


still confused why browsers allow private network access from non-private domains


Oh come on, im not an experienced poker player but even i know that reading the facial expression and body language of your opponent is a core element of the actual game.


Facial expressions and body language is not a core part of modern poker. Many pros play online.

Online poker among friends gained a lot of popularity during Covid. With the computer dealing, its much easier to play for 1-2 hours. Given our stage in life, we can play once a week online instead of once or twice a year in person.


If your goal is to optimize money, then yes.

But since PokerStars VR is only with fake money, most are there just to have fun, at least in the lower stakes tables, so people make (and call) a lot of silly bets.


I think the simple truth is we simply eat too much.

Possible the worldwide most known modern food product is the Big Mac. Named Big Mac, not Best Mac, think about it. And it doesn't stop there, large pizzas, pizzas with a lot on top, XXL Schnitzels, All you can eat Chinese.

A lot people make quantity a priority over quality, guess what happens :)


The whole point of the article is that this is an inadequate explanation. First, the author points out that the increase in calorie consumption has been modest compared to the amount of weight gained. Second, why are we eating more? Moral failure and weak will are the popular explanations, but this fails to explain a variety of observations (Why now - haven’t humans always wanted to eat delicious food? Why do some hunter gatherer societies with surplus food not experience the same thing? Why are wild animals also effected?).


I wouldn't say 400 extra calories is modest, if you consider Calories in/Calories Out then even a modest increase in calories is leading to a continued accumulation.

By the authors examples eating 1.000 calories extra for 10 days gives you 1kg of weight gain. Assuming that the average diet went from 2.000 to 2.400 calories, it makes sense that people should gain 400*365/10.000 = 15kg per year until that extra body mass is increasing base level energy need or people are more physically active (but 1 hour of physical exercise is only 600 calories for many sports).


> we simply eat too much

Hear, hear. I dropped ~70 pounds just by learning my portions. It took about 6 months, but now I can just look at a plate of food and separate out the amount that will fill me, before I even start to eat (the 2-fist rule is a good start). I can make 2-3 meals out of a typical restaurant dinner portion, or I can just order an appetizer as my meal if I'm not taking leftovers.

I dropped another ~20 pounds by cutting out processed foods, preservatives, and chemicals. I likely won't eat something that I couldn't otherwise make a home using whole ingredients.

Restrictive diets never worked for me. I eat whatever I want, whether it be loaded with carbs or fried. I just make sure to include plenty of fiber in my diet, only eat when hungry, and never over eat. It's the only diet that I've been able to sustain for more than a year (~5 years now, to be exact).


This. There's so many ideas and theories on diets, but it seems the bottom line is, are you eating more than you're burning?


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: