Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hackeman300's comments login

Overtime pay? Is this common for oncalls? Never gotten it myself, every time I ask they reply with "just take the time back on another day" as if my time is fungible. Weekend time is worth far more to me than weekday time


Some companies do on-call bonuses, overtime pay for on-call incidents, or other schemes.

In my experience, it’s not a net win. They’ve budgeted the same amount for compensation either way, so you’re probably getting lower base comp if they’re allocating some of it for on-call.

It also creates an atmosphere where on-call becomes more normalized, because you’re getting paid extra to do it. Some people, usually young single people, will try to milk the overtime for as much as they can, dragging out the hours spent doing on-call work because every extra hour spent on the problem makes their paycheck bigger.


I think they finally changed this recently to allow you to paste in- I've resorted to the same workaround in the past though.


It's a real input field now!


Agreed. Also just so you know, invaluable is one of those weird words that is intensified with in-, not negated. It means even more valuable, not worthless


> It means even more valuable, not worthless

The "in-" actually is negation; the word means something like "NOT susceptible to valuation", i.e. beyond value.


Hah, you're right - sorry for the confusion and thanks for the note, I'm not a native English speaker :)


Mullvad is an NSA honeypot? Got any sources on that?


NSA tapped the phones of the German Prime Minister.

They are the same spooks that intercept router gear in transit, flashed it with secret firmware, then put it back in the mail. Like, of course the United Stated Intelligence apparatus, agencies with an unlimited budget, a national security mission, and is completely exempt from all laws has 100% capability to spy on some tiny company in Sweden.


Yes, let me just get my tin foil roll, stand up in front of the mirror,…


I agree there's a very high chance they and the majority of other VPNs are - or if not the US some other intel org.

The US government has form (what was that early crypto machine they sold to allies and it was backdoored?), and they'd be foolish to miss such a strategically obvious play.


>Unless there's some kind option where youtube or twitch signs a contract with select creators and then hands them huge sums of cash upfront for the costs of future content production

For the record this exact thing does exist for bigger streamers. See Ludwig for example, he switched to YouTube exclusively because it was a better deal than his twitch offer.


I've seen paid exclusivity deals from youtube before (https://www.gamesindustry.biz/youtube-reportedly-paid-usd160...) and while I'm surprised they paid a streamer like Ludwig to defect I'm pretty sure those kinds of deals don't exist for 99% of the content that gets uploaded to the platform.


99% of page views? Absolutely. Mr Beast absolutely has a YouTube contract and absolutely drives percentage points of traffic.


Care to elaborate?


That guy clearly has never been around 10 years olds, and vastly over estimates their intelligence.

I'm fact, all evidence points to younger generations being less tech savvy because they don't have to troubleshoot like the older generations did. Everything works, and almost nothing requires any technical configurations.


Good article, but unfortunately it propagates the oft quoted "you eat a credit card worth of plastic each week" myth. Good video here explaining why it likely isn't true https://youtu.be/2Ntp6BqhSng


Given the studies on microplastics i.e. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34484127/ I don't think it's necessary to minimize the situation. If anything it needs more attention.


If OP is correct that the quantity mentioned is an exaggeration, we should be open about that. Popular trust in science—especially in the domains of health and the environment—is extremely low lately and won't be helped by lying to people to try to get them to change their behavior.

(I don't know whether or not the number is correct, but OP isn't wrong to warn against exaggerating.)


I would say, if OPs claim is correct, "x is not happening but y is" To say only the first minimizes the issue, even if unintentionally.


Removing an exaggerated claim is not minimising.


Do those images still live on anywhere? Looks like the original viewer has since been taken down


I don’t think so. The Wayback Machine had some at one point but I haven’t kept up with it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: