This is almost what we do as well. The difference being that we have a API Gateway in front that just invokes the lambda on an internal network, which validates the webhook data and only then does it forward it.
Takes the complexity of having to use a queue out of the equation, though at the expense of potentially lost webhook calls.
Which is fine, and surely an honest mistake. Automation is great, but the way I see it is, how many other projects have been forked and automatically re-licensed, and then profited from without proper attribution? An accident still needs to be flagged, and still needs to be corrected. They also need to be learned from and avoided in the future.
> An accident still needs to be flagged, and still needs to be corrected.
Yes. Additionally, the way such actions are performed is not great because the mechanism used does not provide any way to provide feedback - if the change was done by a user account, then they would have received notifications about the comments posted under the commit, but the ones received by the service account probably go nowhere.
Besides what the other commenters have said, I have 32GB RAM. If Firefox or IntelliJ don't use it, nothing else will. I'd rather have the applications I live in utilise as much memory to make the experience faster and better, than to have unused RAM be wasted. IntelliJ is far superior over VS Code, VIM, etc. IntelliJ is batteries included, whereas VS Code, VIM, and most other editors require additional configurations. Some configurations I've seen have required hours and hours of set up and integration. With IntelliJ on the other hand, it just works. I click run on the main function, and it asks me for the compiler/runtime config the first time round, and afterwards it just fully works. Even running tests is as simply as clicking run from there on.
> The CD community is overly obsessed with velocity.
I think CD is about minimising the amount of code released in one go, which allows you to catch issues much faster and revert issues much quicker. Compare that to something most banks do, release once a quarter, and you'll get stuff like that UK bank that went down for days (can't remember which one it was).
I've yet to meet anyone saying you have to finish your features faster.
Velocity is also highly valuable because if you can get your code in front of users worldwide rapidly, you can more quickly “page out” that code and move on to the next work unburdened. Once you know your code is released fully and working, the cognitive overhead is greatly reduced because multitasking is reduced.
The tradeoff is that if you are pushing your code worldwide in an hour and you shipped a critical bug, your high velocity also creates outsized negative impact.
Seems odd for PM to be vulnerable by the log4j CVE considering (from what I understand) they're mostly Go house. Maybe in the Android app, but otherwise I'd be surprised.
Unrelated: I've been getting quite frustrated with some of the functionality and limitations of PM especially for the price I pay (I have 2 catch-all domains, 1 user for each, which requires 2 times pro accounts), so recently I've been trying to migrate away to mailbox.org. Mailbox allows for automatic PGP encryption when the emails come in which is great. However, there is no way to move all my PM emails onto my mailbox.org account while keeping the encryption (not via the original key set up in Protonmail, nor via new key set up in mailbox.org). Has anyone ever run into such a scenario, and what can be done in this scenario?
I wish there was a good theme out there that has support for lots of different apps, and has a light and dark theme. Dark themes are great when you're working in the dark, but during the day, when the sun is at its highest, and your brightness is maxed, Dark themes just don't work.
Young Dems mirror the behaviour of Conservatives how exactly?
> They have problems with media and depictions that doesn't fit their worldview and don't favor free speech because it was a value by people that partially rejected their ideas.
This is completely missing the point of what the younger generation want. They don't have problems with media and their depictions. They tend to be more inclusive. They fight for people that haven't had a voice previously, or have been mistreated. What they have problems with is hate speech, not free speech.
A lot of people in that younger generation are one step before becoming Stormfront 2.0 because they despise the sensibilities of naive bubble accademics. Just as with minorities you should at least ask before effecting change in their names. They aren't inclusive, that is their brand. Same group dynamics apply to everyone.
"It's true" isn't the bar for hate speech. Hate speech is the direct, explicit fomentation of hatred against groups that are particularly vulnerable to the possibility of that hatred manifesting. You can encourage hatred and also say something based on facts (barring semantic arguments, e.g. your example), and likewise you can express those same facts without expressing hatred.
So you think they'll send ballistic missiles throughout the whole world? Including China, Russia, UK, Germany, France? All of whom have nukes? Good luck with that.
I very explicitly didn’t say they would. I’m saying they could, and implicitly that if America was so inclined it can menace basically anyone and any nation just by pointing at their massive collection of pointy things that hurt.
Takes the complexity of having to use a queue out of the equation, though at the expense of potentially lost webhook calls.