I had apps removed for not describing them as containing ads because Google at that time was busy undermining the definition by defining basically any link to anything as advertising.
The idea seems great, but I was not able to navigate the interface.
If I understood correctly you have access to past data from satellite. If yes, it would be fantastic resource to actually validate avalanches that happened. For that you would need to improve how to find the specific place as well - I could not figure it out.
e.g. I live in the Pyrenees and often go off-piste snowboarding and see avalanches, also sometimes I see some avalanches directly from my home as well. If you give me Pyrenees coverage and better UI I would love to play with it
What browser are you on? Because, IE and Edge does not work right now. This is simply because I do not have access to those browsers. I will probably just block them in the future.
If you use another browser, could you please be more specific about what did not work?
I'll see if I can add the Pyrenees in the coming weeks!
No, my understanding is that the MAC address is always visible, even on wifi networks in WPA/WPA2 personal or enterprise mode.
Also, I believe modern phones randomize their MACs when they scan for networks, but use their real MAC when they connect, and that's visible to anyone within listening range.
Btw, most "guest" wifi networks rely on MAC-based access control, using these same publicly visible MAC addresses.. it's an inherent weakness of the wifi standards and I think the main reason why devices can't randomize their MACs when actually connecting.
Yes, that is true, for modern devices that randomize their MAC addresses. I wasn't up to speed on that. But at least you should be able to see that a device was newly connected to the network. (Due to increased traffic between the two.) If the home WiFi does not have very many devices coming and going, you could probably do pattern matching and learn to fingerprint individual devices. At the very least, you should be able to see that "someone is home".
According to someone at DerbyCon (I know who, but don't have permission to say who), they made the claim that Bluetooth is always on and does not randomize the management frames. And that when phones turn off Bluetooth, they actually just turn off data comms from the BT chip TO the mobile CPU.
Their claim was that BT still responds to mgmt frames even when off, doesnt randomize MAC addresses, and some data can even be sent that will then turn on when the BT is 'turned on'.
I saw demonstrations of it. It, well, scared and awed me.
Didn't they get in trouble doing this with their amazon competitor? I remember for a while searching for things would give me options to buy them from google.
