Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fakeempire's comments login

I feel rude even saying this because I like the work you guys do and don't want to bum this person out, but I had to stop listening to the ones with Johnny. He seems to just wax poetically so often. I'm sure hes super nice, but it feels like he talks for the majority of the episode instead of letting the guests and other hosts speak. Every time he has a thought you know your in for a 3 minute spiel.

Sorry, Johnny! It's probably just me.


> Really, I don't understand how this is news. It's what was going to happen, everyone with half a brain has known that since facebook started being a thing

Just because something isn't a surprise to you, doesn't mean its not news. I know that wild fires will inevitably happen, but I'm happy that they are reported on the news.

> So how is it that there are still people who apparently care that this happens?

So how is it that there are still people who apparently don't realize that the 2B+ users of facebook don't know everything they know.


erikb, I'm not writing this to be rude, but I am hoping it can change your perspective a little. Every sentence in your reply is so negative. You almost certainly won't get something you want if you think it's impossible. It means you wont bother trying. You have an excuse for everything. Its completely possible. I've worked for a large company for 2 years and made it happen. I know plenty of other people that do it as well.

The attitude in your comment was such a bummer I had to log in for the first time in years just to respond. Try to be more positive and go after what you want. Have a good rest of the weekend.


I think parent is right to point out that remote/contract work is more tenuous than the alternative in most cases. I also found your comment aggressive and nasty... the irony of the "stop being negative" put-down.


Sorry it came off that way. I'll keep that in mind next time I comment.


Your comment above didn't come off as negative to me fwiw. I had the same reaction.

The error in thought is limiting his perspective to people he knows personally, which of course can make it seem unlikely or impossible. For example, I don't personally know anyone who lives and works in Silicon Valley and doesn't struggle to make a living, but I do understand that it would be possible for me to try to do so if that was my desire.


I think he is mostly correct though. "If you have a good resume and live 30 minutes outside even a small town, but you also have to drive everywhere" isn't really comparable to the "standard deal" in a city.


This is not negative, this is called objective. The bear eats fish. That is nice and relaxing for the bear, but really painful for the fish. And there is not much the fish can do about it. Will the positive thinking fish get better results? No. Has the bear an innate advantage in that exchange? Yep. Is it negative to say that the bear has innate advantage? Nope.

If you think that your success comes from happy thoughts I bet you are in a similar good situation as the bear.

E.g. compare a western european software manager to his developer comrades in eastern europe offices. Independent of his skill he can make $70-150k a year. Most of his programmers will be in other countries where even people 5x his skill and putting in 3x his hours will earn around $18k/year. (Example could be Munich vs Brno, 600 km apart)

Who do you think can achieve more with his happy thoughts?

I don't say "do something for the poor". I don't say "you are bad for having an advantage". What I want to make sure is that one knows about ones advantage and that others can't easily copy it. In fact ignoring that difference is quite assholey.


I'm struggling to not sound rude, but that's the whole point of the submission. He was surprised, you're surprised, I'm surprised, everyone here is surprised. Facebook was so surprised that they gave him money.


> It definitely needs some background, cue from /r/apple might be a good idea.

Please, please no. Its fine the way it is.


What is the tool you are using for the responsive testing? http://dun4nx4d6jyre.cloudfront.net/assets/toolb-xreponsive....

I've been using a mediocre plugin for chrome to do this testing but its flaky. That looks like exactly what I want.



You should link this story to here http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/08Migration

That is the actual information about the release.


You are right, just submit it prematurely .


More like postmaturely... it was released on April 1st, and the roadmap has last been changed nine days ago.


Actually OpenBSD does have nearly flawless documentation.

It has other issues but documentation isnt one of them.


They actually consider documentation errors to be as serious as bugs.


Excuse my ignorance, but why would that change all the instances in this case? I don't understand. Would you mind explaining more?


      def __init__(self, ..., foo={}):
        self.foo = foo
In this case, 'foo={}' is evaluated once, and returns a pointer to a dict(). After that, foo is always pointing to the same dict, not to a newly created empty dict.

Run this in a Python interpreter:

  class PhoneBook(object):
    def __init__(self, names={}):
      self.names = names

  phonebook1 = PhoneBook()
  phonebook2 = PhoneBook()

  phonebook1.names['Bob'] = '+1 555 5555'

  print phonebook2.names['Bob']
The only thing that is really safe to put in the defaults are immutable values.


"I have found the policy of installing all updates when first setting up a Windows server and then never touching it again to work quite well."

I think you need to reevaluate your policies immediately. Not applying security patching isn't a good policy.


You have a choice between:

The chance of someone bothering to hack you multiplied by the chance that the new patch doesn't include several new security bugs

Or the chance of a new untested patch bringing down your business.


This is why we use QA servers for most of our systems. We try our best to test all functionality on a patched QA server before deploying patches to our production servers. We have had good success doing this (with Windows at least.)


The real question is why anyone would willingly run a windows server for anything?


So leaving your main system exposed to the new zero day vunerability for a whole day while you do the tests!


No. You wait a few hours (maybe half a day) and see how other people get on with the patch. Then you patch.

Or you leave more holes for the automated bots and worms to exploit.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: